[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Peter Volkov]

В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +0000, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет:
> src_prepare() {
> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.1_rc13-peercred.patch"
> 	epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.1_rc20-pkcs11.patch"
> 	use ipv6 && epatch "${WORKDIR}/${PN}-2.1.1-ipv6-${IPV6_VERSION}.patch"
> 	use eurephia && epatch "${DISTDIR}/${PN}-2.1.0_eurephia.patch"
> 	sed -i \
> 		-e "s/gcc \${CC_FLAGS}/\${CC} \${CFLAGS} -Wall/" \
> 		-e "s/-shared/-shared \${LDFLAGS}/" \
> 		plugin/*/Makefile || die "sed failed"
> 	eautoreconf

Is autoreconf really necessary here? Looks like it is redundant in case
ipv6 or eurephia are disabled.

> src_configure() {

> 	econf ${myconf} \
> 		$(use_enable passwordsave password-save) \
> 		$(use_enable ssl) \
> 		$(use_enable ssl crypto) \
> 		$(use_enable iproute2) \
> 		|| die "configure failed"

|| die is redundant here.


> src_compile() {
> 	use static && sed -i -e '/^LIBS/s/LIBS = /LIBS = -static /' Makefile
> 
> 	emake || die "make failed"
> 
> 	if ! use minimal ; then
> 		cd plugin
> 		for i in $( ls 2>/dev/null ); do

This is bad construction:
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#for_i_in_.24.28ls_.2A.mp3.29

> 			[[ ${i} == "README" || ${i} == "examples" || ${i} == "defer" ]] && continue
> 			[[ ${i} == "auth-pam" ]] && ! use pam && continue
> 			einfo "Building ${i} plugin"
> 			cd "${i}"
> 			emake CC=$(tc-getCC) || die "make failed"
> 			cd ..

I think pushd/popd are better suited for this then cd "${dir}" / cd ..

> 		done
> 		cd ..
> 	fi
> }

> 	# remove empty dir
> 	rmdir "${D}/usr/share/doc/openvpn"

|| die is prudent here.

> 	# Empty dir
> 	dodir /etc/openvpn
> 	keepdir /etc/openvpn

dodir is redundant: keepdir will create directory.

> 	# Install some helper scripts
> 	exeinto /etc/openvpn
> 	doexe "${FILESDIR}/up.sh"
> 	doexe "${FILESDIR}/down.sh"

|| die after doexe is really good idea.

> 	# Install the init script and config file
> 	newinitd "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.1.init" openvpn
> 	newconfd "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.1.conf" openvpn

|| die absent

> 	# install examples, controlled by the respective useflag
> 	if use examples ; then
> 		# dodoc does not supportly support directory traversal, #15193
> 		insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF}/examples
> 		doins -r sample-{config-files,keys,scripts} contrib
> 		prepalldocs
> 	fi

> 	# Install plugins and easy-rsa
> 	if ! use minimal ; then
> 		cd easy-rsa/2.0
> 		make install "DESTDIR=${D}/usr/share/${PN}/easy-rsa"
> 		cd ../..
> 
> 		exeinto "/usr/$(get_libdir)/${PN}"
> 		doexe plugin/*/*.so
> 	fi
> }
> 
> pkg_postinst() {
> 	# Add openvpn user so openvpn servers can drop privs
> 	# Clients should run as root so they can change ip addresses,
> 	# dns information and other such things.
> 	enewgroup openvpn
> 	enewuser openvpn "" "" "" openvpn
> 
> 	if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ; then

I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably there
are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.

> 		ewarn "WARNING: The openvpn init script has changed"
> 		ewarn ""
> 	fi
> 
> 	einfo "The openvpn init script expects to find the configuration file"
> 	einfo "openvpn.conf in /etc/openvpn along with any extra files it may need."

This information is for users, so, please, use elog here.

> 	einfo ""
> 	einfo "To create more VPNs, simply create a new .conf file for it and"
> 	einfo "then create a symlink to the openvpn init script from a link called"
> 	einfo "openvpn.newconfname - like so"
> 	einfo "   cd /etc/openvpn"
> 	einfo "   ${EDITOR##*/} foo.conf"
> 	einfo "   cd /etc/init.d"
> 	einfo "   ln -s openvpn openvpn.foo"
> 	einfo ""
> 	einfo "You can then treat openvpn.foo as any other service, so you can"
> 	einfo "stop one vpn and start another if you need to."
> 
> 	if grep -Eq "^[ \t]*(up|down)[ \t].*" "${ROOT}/etc/openvpn"/*.conf 2>/dev/null ; then
> 		ewarn ""
> 		ewarn "WARNING: If you use the remote keyword then you are deemed to be"
> 		ewarn "a client by our init script and as such we force up,down scripts."
> 		ewarn "These scripts call /etc/openvpn/\$SVCNAME-{up,down}.sh where you"
> 		ewarn "can move your scripts to."
> 	fi
> 
> 	if ! use minimal ; then
> 		einfo ""
> 		einfo "plugins have been installed into /usr/$(get_libdir)/${PN}"
> 	fi
> 
> 	if use ipv6 ; then
> 		einfo ""
> 		einfo "This build contains IPv6-Patch from JuanJo Ciarlante."
> 		einfo "For more information please visit:"
> 		einfo "http://github.com/jjo/openvpn-ipv6"
> 	fi
> 
> 	if use eurephia ; then
> 		einfo ""
> 		einfo "This build contains eurephia patch."
> 		einfo "For more information please visit:"
> 		einfo "http://www.eurephia.net/"
> 	fi
> }

-- 
Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Thomas Sachau]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 627 bytes --]

Am 01.10.2010 15:07, schrieb Peter Volkov:
> В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +0000, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет:
> 
>> 			[[ ${i} == "README" || ${i} == "examples" || ${i} == "defer" ]] && continue
>> 			[[ ${i} == "auth-pam" ]] && ! use pam && continue
>> 			einfo "Building ${i} plugin"
>> 			cd "${i}"
>> 			emake CC=$(tc-getCC) || die "make failed"
>> 			cd ..
> 
> I think pushd/popd are better suited for this then cd "${dir}" / cd ..
> 

You can make it even shorter by using the -C switch of (e)make, so you dont have to manually
enter/exit the dir.

-- 
Thomas Sachau

Gentoo Linux Developer


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Nirbheek Chauhan]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +0000, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет:
>> src_compile() {
>>       use static && sed -i -e '/^LIBS/s/LIBS = /LIBS = -static /' Makefile
>>
>>       emake || die "make failed"
>>
>>       if ! use minimal ; then
>>               cd plugin
>>               for i in $( ls 2>/dev/null ); do
>
> This is bad construction:
> http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#for_i_in_.24.28ls_.2A.mp3.29
>

A nice way around this is to do the following:

    ls -1 | while read i; do

`read` delimits on newline, so you're safe.

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Ryan Hill]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1716 bytes --]

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:47:38 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +0000, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет:
> >> src_compile() {
> >>       use static && sed -i -e '/^LIBS/s/LIBS = /LIBS = -static /' Makefile
> >>
> >>       emake || die "make failed"
> >>
> >>       if ! use minimal ; then
> >>               cd plugin
> >>               for i in $( ls 2>/dev/null ); do
> >
> > This is bad construction:
> > http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#for_i_in_.24.28ls_.2A.mp3.29
> >
> 
> A nice way around this is to do the following:
> 
>     ls -1 | while read i; do
> 
> `read` delimits on newline, so you're safe.

This strips leading and trailing whitespace.

$ touch " test1"
$ touch "test2 "
$ touch "test 3"
$ touch " test 4 "

$ ls -1 | while read i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
###test2###
###test 3###
###test1###
###test 4###

instead use:

$ ls -1 | while IFS= read i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
###test2 ###
###test 3###
### test1###
### test 4 ###

or recursively:

$ find . -type f -print0 \
  | while IFS= read -d $'\0' i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
###./ test1###
###./ test 4 ###
###./test 3###
###./test2 ###

or just make things simple on yourself :)

$ for i in *; do echo "###${i}###"; done
### test1###
###test2 ###
###test 3###
### test 4 ###


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,             we hold our breath, we spin around the world
toolchain, wxwidgets            you and me cling to the outside of the earth
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Nirbheek Chauhan]

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:47:38 +0530
> Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> A nice way around this is to do the following:
>>
>>     ls -1 | while read i; do
>>
>> `read` delimits on newline, so you're safe.
>
> This strips leading and trailing whitespace.
>
> $ touch " test1"
> $ touch "test2 "
> $ touch "test 3"
> $ touch " test 4 "
>
> $ ls -1 | while read i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
> ###test2###
> ###test 3###
> ###test1###
> ###test 4###
>

Damn, I never knew that.

> instead use:
>
> $ ls -1 | while IFS= read i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
> ###test2 ###
> ###test 3###
> ### test1###
> ### test 4 ###
>
> or recursively:
>
> $ find . -type f -print0 \
>  | while IFS= read -d $'\0' i; do echo "###${i}###"; done
> ###./ test1###
> ###./ test 4 ###
> ###./test 3###
> ###./test2 ###
>
> or just make things simple on yourself :)
>
> $ for i in *; do echo "###${i}###"; done
> ### test1###
> ###test2 ###
> ###test 3###
> ### test 4 ###
>

I wonder how many scripts I wrote now have this subtle bug. Thanks!

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Jeroen Roovers]

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:47:38 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote:

> >>               for i in $( ls 2>/dev/null ); do

[...]

> A nice way around this is to do the following:
> 
>     ls -1 | while read i; do

What pva carelessly omitted to point out was that using ls(1) is
incredibly bad bash programming, which is probably why stderr is being
redirected in this case, too. :)


     jer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Dirkjan Ochtman]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]

Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.

>>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ; then
>
> I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably there
> are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.

I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
anyone mentioned any.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 725 bytes --]

On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:09:06 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov wrote:
> >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ; then
> > 
> > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably there
> > are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> 
> I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> anyone mentioned any.

[ -e ] will break with multiple files (which is the whole point of the glob ?)

you could use find, but that doesnt really seem any better than the ls (which 
btw will spill errors if no local.conf exists):
	find "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/ -maxdepth 1 -name local.conf >/dev/null
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Jeroen Roovers]

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:09:06 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]
> 
> Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.
> 
> >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ;
> >> then
> >
> > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably
> > there are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> 
> I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> anyone mentioned any.

for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
	[ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
done

If no ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf is found, it returns the exact
string; which doesn't exist so Nothing Happens.


     jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 990 bytes --]

On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:26:31 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:09:06 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]
> > 
> > Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.
> > 
> > >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ;
> > >> 
> > >> then
> > > 
> > > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably
> > > there are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> > 
> > I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> > anyone mentioned any.
> 
> for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> 	[ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> done
> 
> If no ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf is found, it returns the exact
> string; which doesn't exist so Nothing Happens.

i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.  and this has quoting 
problems, but that's ancillary ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1325 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Tue Oct 12 22:57:11 +0200 2010:
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:26:31 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:09:06 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > > [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]
> > > 
> > > Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.
> > > 
> > > >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ;
> > > >> 
> > > >> then
> > > > 
> > > > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably
> > > > there are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> > > 
> > > I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> > > anyone mentioned any.
> > 
> > for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> >     [ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> > done
> > 
> > If no ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf is found, it returns the exact
> > string; which doesn't exist so Nothing Happens.
> 
> i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.  and this has quoting 
> problems, but that's ancillary ...
> -mike

What about defining following function?

any_exists() {
    local f

    for f; do
        [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
    done

    return 1
}
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1508 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 04:23:16 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Tue Oct 12 22:57:11 +0200 2010:
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:26:31 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:09:06 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > > > [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.
> > > > 
> > > > >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ;
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> then
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably
> > > > > there are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> > > > 
> > > > I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> > > > anyone mentioned any.
> > > 
> > > for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> > > 
> > >     [ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> > > 
> > > done
> > > 
> > > If no ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf is found, it returns the exact
> > > string; which doesn't exist so Nothing Happens.
> > 
> > i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.  and this has quoting
> > problems, but that's ancillary ...
 
> What about defining following function?
> 
> any_exists() {
>     local f
> 
>     for f; do
>         [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
>     done
> 
>     return 1
> }

perhaps if it had a better name and were in a common location (eclass)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1903 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 16:13:58 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 04:23:16 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Tue Oct 12 22:57:11 +0200 2010:
> > > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:26:31 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:09:06 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > > > > [a very thorough review of the openvpn ebuild]
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for reviewing, I've fixed most of the issues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ;
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >> then
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably
> > > > > > there are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> > > > > anyone mentioned any.
> > > > 
> > > > for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> > > > 
> > > >     [ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> > > > 
> > > > done
> > > > 
> > > > If no ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf is found, it returns the exact
> > > > string; which doesn't exist so Nothing Happens.
> > > 
> > > i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.  and this has quoting
> > > problems, but that's ancillary ...
>  
> > What about defining following function?
> > 
> > any_exists() {
> >     local f
> > 
> >     for f; do
> >         [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
> >     done
> > 
> >     return 1
> > }
> 
> perhaps if it had a better name and were in a common location (eclass)
> -mike

So give it a better name. :-)  In this case 'ls' shouldn't hurt anybody,
but such function solves problem in much more elegant manner -
regardless it's definied in an ebuild or eclass.
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:58 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> > any_exists() {
> >     local f
> > 
> >     for f; do
> >         [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
> >     done
> > 
> >     return 1
> > }
> 
> perhaps if it had a better name and were in a common location (eclass)

has_file()?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 530 bytes --]

Excerpts from Michał Górny's message of Wed Oct 13 18:41:54 +0200 2010:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13:58 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > > any_exists() {
> > >     local f
> > > 
> > >     for f; do
> > >         [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
> > >     done
> > > 
> > >     return 1
> > > }
> > 
> > perhaps if it had a better name and were in a common location (eclass)
> 
> has_file()?

What it would mean? „Has”?
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 289 bytes --]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:51:31 +0200
Amadeusz Żołnowski <aidecoe@aidecoe.name> wrote:

> > has_file()?
> 
> What it would mean? „Has”?

It's reference to has() function specified by PMS. 'The file system has
a file named one-of ${@}' :P.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 443 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 13:26:24 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:51:31 +0200 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > has_file()?
> > 
> > What it would mean? „Has”?
> 
> It's reference to has() function specified by PMS. 'The file system has
> a file named one-of ${@}' :P.

the has functions are typically used to look up an item in a list.  i'd go 
with "path_exists" since this is doing -e and not -f.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 845 bytes --]

here's what i'll commit to eutils.eclass:

# @FUNCTION: path_exists
# @USAGE: [-a|-o] <paths>
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Check if the specified paths exist.  Works for all types of paths
# (files/dirs/etc...).  The -a and -o flags control the requirements
# of the paths.  They correspond to "and" and "or" logic.  So the -a
# flag means all the paths must exist while the -o flag means at least
# one of the paths must exist.  The default behavior is "and".  If no
# paths are specified, then the return value is "false".
path_exists() {
	local opt=$1
	[[ ${opt} == -[ao] ]] && shift || opt="-a"

	# no paths -> return false
	# same behavior as: [[ -e "" ]]
	[[ $# -eq 0 ]] && return 1

	local p r=0
	for p in "$@" ; do
		[[ -e ${p} ]]
		: $(( r += $? ))
	done

	case ${opt} in
		-a) return $(( r != 0 )) ;;
		-o) return $(( r == $# )) ;;
	esac
}
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 696 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 20:51:35 +0200 2010:
> path_exists() {
>     local opt=$1
>     [[ ${opt} == -[ao] ]] && shift || opt="-a"
> 
>     # no paths -> return false
>     # same behavior as: [[ -e "" ]]
>     [[ $# -eq 0 ]] && return 1
> 
>     local p r=0
>     for p in "$@" ; do
>         [[ -e ${p} ]]
>         : $(( r += $? ))
>     done

1) Why check every path in both "and" and "or" cases?

2) Even simpler:
for p; do
  [[ -e $p ]]
  ((r+=$?))
done

> 
>     case ${opt} in
>         -a) return $(( r != 0 )) ;;
>         -o) return $(( r == $# )) ;;
>     esac
> }
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1234 bytes --]

Excerpts from Amadeusz Żołnowski's message of Wed Oct 13 21:20:01 +0200 2010:
> Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 20:51:35 +0200 2010:
> > path_exists() {
> >     local opt=$1
> >     [[ ${opt} == -[ao] ]] && shift || opt="-a"
> > 
> >     # no paths -> return false
> >     # same behavior as: [[ -e "" ]]
> >     [[ $# -eq 0 ]] && return 1
> > 
> >     local p r=0
> >     for p in "$@" ; do
> >         [[ -e ${p} ]]
> >         : $(( r += $? ))
> >     done
> 
> 1) Why check every path in both "and" and "or" cases?
> 
> 2) Even simpler:
> for p; do
>   [[ -e $p ]]
>   ((r+=$?))
> done
> 
> > 
> >     case ${opt} in
> >         -a) return $(( r != 0 )) ;;
> >         -o) return $(( r == $# )) ;;
> >     esac
> > }


And why putting different tasks into one function?  My suggestion:

any_paths() {
    local f

    for f; do
        [[ -e $f ]] && return 0
    done

    return 1
}

all_paths() {
    local f

    for f; do
        [[ -e $f ]] || return 1
    done

    return 0
}


Isn't it simpler approach?  And have benfits over 2in1:

1) More readable in use.
2) More efficient.
3) 1 + 1 < 2 in this case ;-)
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 296 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> And why putting different tasks into one function?

for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist, 
test_file, test_dir, etc...

it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> 
> for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist, 
> test_file, test_dir, etc...
> 
> it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> -mike

So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and
less readable function is the old 'test' program?  Please, reconsider my
solution with more reason.  Moreover we're using 'test' as '[[ … ]]'
which changes much in readability.  Next thing is that '-a' and '-o'
don't strictly conform to 'test' convention.
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1004 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13:18 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > 
> > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > 
> > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> 
> So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and
> less readable function is the old 'test' program?  Please, reconsider my
> solution with more reason.

we prioritize differently.  i prefer unified code with options.  you preferred 
unrolled duplicated code.

> Moreover we're using 'test' as '[[ … ]]' which changes much in readability.

what are you talking about ?  no one is using `test` in their code and if they 
are, their code is broken.  none of the stuff ive posted is running `test`.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Thu Oct 14 00:32:40 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13:18 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > > 
> > > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > > 
> > > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> > 
> > So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and
> > less readable function is the old 'test' program?  Please, reconsider my
> > solution with more reason.
> 
> we prioritize differently.  i prefer unified code with options.

In which part it's unified?  As I said it doesn't conform much to 'test'
convention.


> you preferred unrolled duplicated code.

What I'm duplicating?  Lines "local f", "for f; do" or "}"?  And what's
bad about it while still having less LOC?


> > Moreover we're using 'test' as '[[ … ]]' which changes much in readability.
> 
> what are you talking about ?  no one is using `test` in their code and if they 
> are, their code is broken.  none of the stuff ive posted is running `test`.

I've messed up with that paragraph.  The point was that "path_exists -a"
is even less readable than "test -e something".  As you've said you
wouldn't use "test -e" syntax instead of "[[ -e ]]", but let's skip that
part…
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1344 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 19:08:55 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Thu Oct 14 00:32:40 +0200 2010:
> > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13:18 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> > > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > > > 
> > > > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > > > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > > > 
> > > > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> > > 
> > > So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and
> > > less readable function is the old 'test' program?  Please, reconsider
> > > my solution with more reason.
> > 
> > we prioritize differently.  i prefer unified code with options.
> 
> In which part it's unified?

the file checking & status accumulation.  extending my code to add more 
options in the future is easier as well.

> As I said it doesn't conform much to 'test' convention.

sure it does

this thread is going nowhere.  i believe my proposal is the way to go, and we 
arent arguing over anything of too much value (i.e. bike shedding).  no one 
else has an opinion, so ive gone my route.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2297 bytes --]

Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Sun Oct 17 23:33:57 +0200 2010:
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 19:08:55 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Thu Oct 14 00:32:40 +0200 2010:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 18:13:18 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010:
> > > > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > > > > 
> > > > > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > > > > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > > > > 
> > > > > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> > > > 
> > > > So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and
> > > > less readable function is the old 'test' program?  Please, reconsider
> > > > my solution with more reason.
> > > 
> > > we prioritize differently.  i prefer unified code with options.
> > 
> > In which part it's unified?
> 
> the file checking & status accumulation.  extending my code to add more 
> options in the future is easier as well.

The name doesn't allow for any sensible extension.  I'd advise to change
it to 'mtest' (which would stand for "multiple test") or something like
that and give up default behaviour.  OK, and then your /options way/
starts to make sense. (Although status accumulation has still no benefit
here.)

Having such an 'mtest' we might use it in following way:

mtest -[oa] -[fredcw...] path1 path2 ... pathn

And stil we can do it simpler:

mtest() {
    local f log_op=$1 test_op=$2; shift 2
    
    case $log_op in
    -a) for f; do
            eval "[[ $test_op '$f' ]]" || return 1
        done
        return 0
        ;;
    -o) for f; do
            eval "[[ $test_op '$f' ]]" && return 0
        done
        return 1
        ;;
    esac
    return -1
}


– it's just a rough draft, proof of concept.  You've already gone your
way…


> this thread is going nowhere.  i believe my proposal is the way to go, and we 
> arent arguing over anything of too much value (i.e. bike shedding).  no one 
> else has an opinion, so ive gone my route.


Cheers,
-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA  4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:46:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> 
> for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist, 
> test_file, test_dir, etc...
> 
> it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.

And we finally reach the point where there is no reason to implement
a new function when it's supposed to be basically longer and more
unclear to use than:

[[ -f a || -f b || -f c ]]

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 727 bytes --]

On Monday, October 18, 2010 03:08:15 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:46:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > 
> > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > 
> > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> 
> And we finally reach the point where there is no reason to implement
> a new function when it's supposed to be basically longer and more
> unclear to use than:
> 
> [[ -f a || -f b || -f c ]]

except that we're using globs, so our example isnt applicable.
	[[ -f */a ]]
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 830 bytes --]

On Monday, October 18, 2010 14:06:26 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, October 18, 2010 03:08:15 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:46:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > > 
> > > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist,
> > > test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > > 
> > > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> > 
> > And we finally reach the point where there is no reason to implement
> > a new function when it's supposed to be basically longer and more
> > unclear to use than:
> > 
> > [[ -f a || -f b || -f c ]]
> 
> except that we're using globs, so our example isnt applicable.

err, "our" -> "your"
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1521 bytes --]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:06:26 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Monday, October 18, 2010 03:08:15 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:46:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> > > > And why putting different tasks into one function?
> > > 
> > > for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries:
> > > test_exist, test_file, test_dir, etc...
> > > 
> > > it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality.
> > 
> > And we finally reach the point where there is no reason to implement
> > a new function when it's supposed to be basically longer and more
> > unclear to use than:
> > 
> > [[ -f a || -f b || -f c ]]
> 
> except that we're using globs, so our example isnt applicable.
> 	[[ -f */a ]]

Ok. So, let's sum up what your function does with wildcards:

1) when passed a single wildcard, the OR and AND variants basically do
the same (unless one of the matched files disappears during the
check), so their co-existence is useless in that case.

2) When passed multiple wildcards (or a wildcard and filenames), these
variants indeed are both useful but the AND variant does unnecessary
amount of checking (checking each filename matched by each wildcard)
and is fragile to a single matched file disappearing during the runtime.

So, it's basically safer to use:

if path_exists -o a/* && path_exists -o b/*; then
	...
fi

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> # If no paths are specified, then the return value is "false".

For the "or" case that's fine. But for the "and" case, I would expect
that the function returns true if called with no arguments.

Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:37:02 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > # If no paths are specified, then the return value is "false".
> 
> For the "or" case that's fine. But for the "and" case, I would expect
> that the function returns true if called with no arguments.

i disagree as the comment says: it's sticking to the bash behavior.

f=
[[ -e ${f} ]] && [[ -e ${f} ]]
[[ -e ${f} ]] || [[ -e ${f} ]]

these both return false.  as does this function:

f=
path_exists -a ${f}
path_exists -o ${f}
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 513 bytes --]

On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 16:09:06 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:07, Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>       if [[ -n $(ls /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf 2>/dev/null) ]] ; then
> > 
> > I'd suggested [ -e /etc/openvpn/*/local.conf ] here, but probably there
> > are better alternatives. Also ${ROOT} is missed here.
> 
> I've put ${ROOT} in, are there no better alternatives? I don't think
> anyone mentioned any.

please to convert to new eutils.eclass:path_exists()
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Vaeth]

Mike Frysinger wrote:

> > for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> > 	[ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> > done
> 
> i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.

Why do you think so? No external program on which you must rely,
and if you put a "break" in there, the loop is just syntactical.
Here is another possibility if you do not need positional
parameters anymore:

set -- "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf
if test -e "${1}"
then ...
fi

And if you do need, you can write a function:

Test2() {
	test "${1}" "${2}"
}

if Test2 -e "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf
then ...
fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 954 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 03:08:24 Vaeth wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > for foo in ${ROOT}/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf; do
> > > 
> > > 	[ -e ${foo} ] && bar ${foo}
> > > 
> > > done
> > 
> > i'd say doing a loop is worse than a `ls` hack.
> 
> Why do you think so? No external program on which you must rely,
> and if you put a "break" in there, the loop is just syntactical.
> Here is another possibility if you do not need positional
> parameters anymore:
> 
> set -- "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf
> if test -e "${1}"
> then ...
> fi
> 
> And if you do need, you can write a function:
> 
> Test2() {
> 	test "${1}" "${2}"
> }
> 
> if Test2 -e "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf
> then ...
> fi

relying on an external program to get a single line of readable code is better 
than multiple lines of code that attempt to do the same thing.  your further 
examples here are even worse on many levels.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Vaeth]

Mike Frysinger wrote:

> relying on an external program

The point is that external programs can have all sorts of undesired
side effects. For instance, if an directory is not readable (or
readable but not executable or is on $FILESYSTEM with who-knows-what
permissions or accessability problems) it can cause unexpected
errors which otherwise are treated  by "standard" shell behavior:
*This* is why the ls is hackish here, not the readability.

About the readability, one can always have different opinions,
but your attack is inappropriate:

> to get a single line of readable code is better than
> multiple lines of code that attempt to do the same thing.

First, my suggestions are not "multiple lines" but only
exactly *two* lines (i.e. only one additional line):
Please compare

set -- "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf
if test -e "${1}"

with the "single line of readable code" which contains not less code,
but is only squashed into one line:

if [[ -e $(ls -1 -- "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf) ]]

Is this really so much more readable?
(The "--" can be omitted in both code pieces iff portage has a test
that ROOT does not start with "-").

And if you really want only readability, you should like even much
more my second suggestion which could also be squashed as two lines:

Exists() { test -e "${1}"; }
if Exists "${ROOT}"/etc/openvpn/*/local.conf

I would say this is *way* more readable than the complex 1-liner.
Of course, opinions may differ, but I think an unfounded attack as

> your further examples here are even worse on many levels.

is not appropriate here.

Regards
Martin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 947 bytes --]

On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:35:20 Vaeth wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > relying on an external program
> 
> The point is that external programs can have all sorts of undesired
> side effects. For instance, if an directory is not readable (or
> readable but not executable or is on $FILESYSTEM with who-knows-what
> permissions or accessability problems) it can cause unexpected
> errors which otherwise are treated  by "standard" shell behavior:
> *This* is why the ls is hackish here, not the readability.

and if you had read all my replies, you would see i already pointed out this 
problem with the original code

> but your attack is inappropriate:

might want to review the meanings of these words.  i said your examples were 
worse, not better.  i didnt say anything about you personally.

the rest of your e-mail isnt worth responding to, so i wont bother.  as most 
likely will any follow up to this.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]