From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OwKlJ-00046Z-L9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:08:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F0C0E0844 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6AFE068E for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (unknown [94.158.169.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6841B4087 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201009161530.12532.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4C921C29.6010502@gentoo.org> <1284661949.14378.289.camel@tablet> <4C92673B.7040702@gentoo.org> <201009161530.12532.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:41:27 +0400 Message-ID: <1284666087.14378.437.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b3bb19dc-85d8-4ef1-9795-3a5ba4b6a7d5 X-Archives-Hash: 82e290c8bb4010479f6f4092fadb5b9a =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 16/09/2010 =D0=B2 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >=20 > > FOX_PV=3D"${FOX_PV:-${PV}}" >=20 > while you're here, i'd change to: > : ${FOX_PV:=3D${PV}}=20 Why? This looks less readable... --=20 Peter.