From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot6Il-0006l7-3J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:06:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 076E7E0B99; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB773E105F for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (169.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE6B1B4007 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs & editbugs users From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20100907214459.GA11425@laptop> References: <20100907224727.5d6ccfae@amit.kihnet.sk> <20100907214459.GA11425@laptop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-52gbLs/QJryW2iKk7lDv" Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:05:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1283897135.4629.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-Archives-Salt: f34561e6-e635-40b7-b8a1-1294d01c42b2 X-Archives-Hash: 644d4262d7b6c9ef6e1624ec59b69f9f --=-52gbLs/QJryW2iKk7lDv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-random@mail.ru escribi=C3=B3= : > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it. > >=20 > > I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and > > that state is documented in the bug. > >=20 > > If we keep every upstream bug open instead of closed, we'd have probabl= y > > another 2500 open bugs (5312 RESO/UPSTREAM in the history of Gentoo, an= d > > I'm ballparking that 50% aren't actually fixed yet upstream). >=20 > Bug may be a blocker. And marking it as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM you may > unblock another bug (e.g. stabilization request) which should be still > blocked because there is no fixed package in tree. >=20 In most cases when it's really a blocker, bug will remain opened anyway until solved or, if not possible, stabilization will be postponed. --=-52gbLs/QJryW2iKk7lDv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkyGty4ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RCqACfXRhX8jDQEvVogU0QdsfwbOMO DtcAn19E7SOO8nivBNC79QGMKy9vyAvc =Dabg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-52gbLs/QJryW2iKk7lDv--