From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPnjV-0006Ud-Mv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:01:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9CKpAV0016539; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:51:10 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9CKlu85018131 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:47:56 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF264A46722 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:57:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12425-04 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:57:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www2.chlastej.net (unknown [82.99.172.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC1EA46720 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:57:26 +0200 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1279167362.20051012225726@gentoo.org> To: =?Windows-1250?Q?Petteri_R=E4ty?= Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Tomcat 5.5 in portage In-Reply-To: <434D49A9.3060703@gentoo.org> References: <20051012090952.07820d52.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> <434D49A9.3060703@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------88133214B71AAD6" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.2 (20050629) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.608 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.085, PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.185, WEIRD_PORT=0.507] X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: e602ad78-c385-4974-9818-f8380323f4eb X-Archives-Hash: b87f5bb1146d82085d505bc7388d33b2 ------------88133214B71AAD6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A12.10.2005, 19:36:41, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > RUMI Szabolcs wrote: >> Hello! >>=20 >> Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage. >> It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat >> tarball which makes it work with JDK 1.4 so why isn't there a tomcat-5.5 >> ebuild in portage? Is there some reason for this? > The java herd is heavily understaffed. You can find an ebuild in our > experimental tree in: > http://gentooexperimental.org/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental/ > Regards, > Petteri R=E4ty (Betelgeuse) That's what I've been getting for a couple of days: svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental' svn: PROPFIND of '/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental': SSL negotiation fail= ed: SSL error: unknown protocol (https://gentooexperimental.org) Hmmmm? --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEB= A3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) =20 ------------88133214B71AAD6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDTXi2hxfV/c66PZ4RAvX9AJ4tFkvPBeVeOS8x+sd2mV99zZ9xxwCguD/P VCVTdEZ0GTn+ucx/RpevtkY= =p1g8 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------88133214B71AAD6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list