From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OYG7b-0006ky-DY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:20:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBEE3E0B0B; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD67E0AEB for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (195.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DCDB1B401D for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libunique: ChangeLog libunique-1.1.6.ebuild From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1278929636.8252.4.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> References: <1278929636.8252.4.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mGYx8rYN4sWFhc96YltN" Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1278930007.9939.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-Archives-Salt: 7c456548-1702-4fe3-90e3-e015f8651245 X-Archives-Hash: abfbb78b9bdeb2b6cac2c963ebf2ff05 --=-mGYx8rYN4sWFhc96YltN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 12-07-2010 a las 12:13 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > This revision should be masked. It is a development series release. The > only reason you might need this currently is because of packages passing > bad compile options for release packages like -DG_DISABLED_DEPRECATED > and company. Please check gthumb fix for how to handle such misleaded > packages. >=20 Upstream now considers it as stable: http://live.gnome.org/LibUnique We discussed with upstream and they prefer it as "stable" over 1.0.x --=-mGYx8rYN4sWFhc96YltN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkw67FcACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TwTgCeIZEsAd1AOA1k4HCeK0dR/maN 3o8AnRue4/dcoKSMlM8stCdY4sGuWK71 =axH+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mGYx8rYN4sWFhc96YltN--