From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OVS3X-0007Ho-FL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:28:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D2F6E0A53; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632EBE09C2 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.137] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVRwl-00048t-1X for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:21:35 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-urn0J828A2UmNttH1Sbp" Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1278260899.14354.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: 31b68189-d9e8-4896-82f5-6092899fb938 X-Archives-Hash: 2f95ddbab79246e7025726b71c58706e --=-urn0J828A2UmNttH1Sbp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 04-07-2010 a las 16:29 +0200, Lars Wendler escribi=C3=B3: > Hi list, >=20 > now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be= =20 > honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becom= ing=20 > stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc h= as no=20 > upstream anymore. > If there's anyone out there who would volunteer to maintain openrc, pleas= e=20 > step up now or else I fear we must abandon openrc which would be very sad= . >=20 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/326865 What is its status over current baselayout-1? I am still using last one, but seems that baselayout-2+openrc have some advantages over current stable, then, maybe we should stabilize it anyway (when possible) until a better replacement is found :-/ --=-urn0J828A2UmNttH1Sbp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwwtqMACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SfzQCeOKCGDjqW43oN9P7g1TyyE/V3 I24Anj4GaWX1jyMgwnzXYTb3or8ifDT7 =K4PM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-urn0J828A2UmNttH1Sbp--