From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OTsh7-0005la-OF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:30:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 920E1E0A5B; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DEDE09E7 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.132] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTsaD-0005gV-7B for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:23:49 +0200 Subject: [gentoo-dev] dotnet herd is "empty" From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MlqqUu13q4/140KlzIqw" Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:30:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1277886626.6340.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: a84e3974-e0bb-4b0d-8965-5904f0ad721b X-Archives-Hash: 1ceafbe179c22c4d3ac2ae5139b759c7 --=-MlqqUu13q4/140KlzIqw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello I noticed some time ago that mono stuff is a bit unmaintained, looking at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml#doc_chap32 I confirmed that the only dotnet herd member is retiring ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D149480 ) Would be nice if anybody could join to that herd, since, even if I took care of bumping gtk-sharp stuff, I wouldn't like to take care of mono stuff since I don't really know much about it and, then, I could only look how other distributions are solving some problems, contact upstream... but not much more. Is then anybody interested in taking care of this? Thanks a lot --=-MlqqUu13q4/140KlzIqw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwrAKIACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QBmwCeMWMpxjtGrXc0/qEshkNviloV JUgAnRfOp/q22ZBpOkF2UkU5FyZ/FkEL =a6A5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MlqqUu13q4/140KlzIqw--