From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OR1bP-0006d5-QR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:25:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EF0DE0A6F; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B2AE08BA for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4081B404D for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:24:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.705, BAYES_40=-0.185] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DqenK0VlWg0B for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6061B409F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR1aZ-00037C-JN for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:23 +0200 Received: from liten.csbnet.se ([95.80.45.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:23 +0200 Received: from xake by liten.csbnet.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Peter Hjalmarsson Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1277205855.29893.1.camel@lillen> References: <201006210933.57444.reavertm@gmail.com> <1277130128.7004.43.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <201006211744.38483.reavertm@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: liten.csbnet.se In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-Archives-Salt: 2373a7e0-3bf4-4899-ab17-60e023d5bc13 X-Archives-Hash: 5c35d50fd14a0b833bea92e483de6d9e tis 2010-06-22 klockan 15:17 +0530 skrev Arun Raghavan: > On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan wrote: > [...] > > I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns > > about "introspection" being too generic and non GNOME-y, but "gir" is > > likely to cause confusion. >=20 > "gir" is not good because it gives near-zero information. >=20 > I can still not think of short enough USE flag. I propose we stick to > "introspection". There isn't anything on the horizon that might > overlap with this flag, and I don't see why we should drop using a > simpler flag for the *possibility* that it might overlap with > something else in the future. We can deal with this if it happens. >=20 > Cheers, Why not just gintrospection?