From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OP09f-0007mM-TC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:28:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EFFBE0CA1; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA26E0C95 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [92.36.88.11] (cdma-92-36-88-11.msk.skylink.ru [92.36.88.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34BB1B40A3 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs? From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <1276688510.6965.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1276719378.2644.1.camel@tablet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:26:51 +0400 Message-ID: <1276723611.2962.2.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 88948504-7d97-4067-945d-bb43633db6fd X-Archives-Hash: 3ca95d4c6baacd11450e50aef650eef8 =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 16/06/2010 =D0=B2 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: > > =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 16/06/2010 =D0=B2 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > >> Trying to move the following bug to upstream: > >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253862 > > > > AFAIR this was never libtool bug, but automake and with recent enough > > automake (1.10 for sure) everything should just work. >=20 > this log shows automake-1.11.1: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D231409 I mean there was bug in automake itself. Since package fails it is automake usage that is broken. I'll try to check that. --=20 Peter.