From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OO4jf-0000Lp-EM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:09:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE68AE0B10; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp01.jazztel.es (smtp01.jazztel.es [62.14.3.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9137E087F for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.80] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp01.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO4jB-0006HV-3E for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:09:05 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20100614045910.7a513829@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20100614045910.7a513829@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HPHiCgwDBFNY8HDrTNlI" Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1276502938.6652.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: e8ddd70b-4cfa-455d-81e4-c39abbf2b24b X-Archives-Hash: 37dc36c559c7ce3d9d9ee16ae5b885c6 --=-HPHiCgwDBFNY8HDrTNlI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 04:59 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribi=C3=B3: > What is the problem? The files in place ask you to file a bug report > instead of fiddling with the files yourselves. I put that in place > because I got (fucking) tired of seeing the after effects of people > fiddling with the arch profile files without 1) consideration, 2) > informing the involved arch team. What do you expect? File a bloody bug > report detailing the (commit) problem you are facing and you will > probably see 1) response and 2) cooperation. If you fuck around with > the arch profile files without doing any of that, you will face 1) a > lack of willingness to cooperate and 2) evil wrath. >=20 >=20 > Regards, > jer The problem is that, at least regarding gnome related bugs, there are a lot of keywords dropped for your arch that could be prevented use.masking an USE, like, for example, dev-util/anjuta-2.28*, that is causing us to preserve and old (and broken) 2.24 release only for hppa. My intention is only to try to help you and improve the situation, I also have opened bug reports for every change have committed to, for example, powerpc profiles (you will see that I edited your profile yesterday, but it was because I totally missed the note preventing us to do that, this is why I didn't committed any more changes and sent reply above; it wasn't premeditated) Would you allow me to edit hppa package.use.mask *if I open corresponding bug report* ? Thanks :-) --=-HPHiCgwDBFNY8HDrTNlI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwV45oACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SbzwCeJDLkB39upr8V9UCxGANikDto EJ0AnAgENxHRrV6/Rhc6/ixExCy+3utK =8Dha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HPHiCgwDBFNY8HDrTNlI--