Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --]

El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 04:59 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
> What is the problem? The files in place ask you to file a bug report
> instead of fiddling with the files yourselves. I put that in place
> because I got (fucking) tired of seeing the after effects of people
> fiddling with the arch profile files without 1) consideration, 2)
> informing the involved arch team. What do you expect? File a bloody bug
> report detailing the (commit) problem you are facing and you will
> probably see 1) response and 2) cooperation. If you fuck around with
> the arch profile files without doing any of that, you will face 1) a
> lack of willingness to cooperate and 2) evil wrath.
> 
> 
> Regards,
>      jer

The problem is that, at least regarding gnome related bugs, there are a
lot of keywords dropped for your arch that could be prevented
use.masking an USE, like, for example, dev-util/anjuta-2.28*, that is
causing us to preserve and old (and broken) 2.24 release only for hppa.

My intention is only to try to help you and improve the situation, I
also have opened bug reports for every change have committed to, for
example, powerpc profiles (you will see that I edited your profile
yesterday, but it was because I totally missed the note preventing us to
do that, this is why I didn't committed any more changes and sent reply
above; it wasn't premeditated)

Would you allow me to edit hppa package.use.mask *if I open
corresponding bug report* ?

Thanks :-)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]