From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ONvgg-0001uv-EY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:29:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DC00E0BA6; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B94E09EF for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.80] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONva8-00040b-Ho; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:23:08 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hppa@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1276433026.868.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1276248442.17113.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4C14BE03.6080008@gentoo.org> <1276433026.868.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mwJt6aJzp5cW6D3SSXvd" Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1276468159.1413.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: ea873f46-59a9-41b5-939b-4e28106ee361 X-Archives-Hash: 4d37c6a48236656e87dd075784a338ee --=-mwJt6aJzp5cW6D3SSXvd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty escribi=C3=B3: > > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >=20 > > >=20 > > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: > > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us = to > > > keep bluez keyworded. > > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywordi= ng > > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team = to > > > unmask that USE flag if possible. > > >=20 > >=20 > > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mas= k > > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for > > their packages. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Petteri > >=20 >=20 >=20 > OK, thanks a lot :-D The problem is that hppa team seems to not allow others than they to edit their package.use.mask :-/, is there any special reason for it? --=-mwJt6aJzp5cW6D3SSXvd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwVW78ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9R75gCfS2ycp4Td8P9rDoGL92lxNuHk CIYAn2yB2Z5F6b9zhezSnZeM+lwsb4eu =r8lZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mwJt6aJzp5cW6D3SSXvd--