Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 949 bytes --]

El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió:
> > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > From my point of view, I would prefer to:
> > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to
> > > keep bluez keyworded.
> > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording
> > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to
> > > unmask that USE flag if possible.
> > > 
> > 
> > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask
> > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for
> > their packages.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Petteri
> > 
> 
> 
> OK, thanks a lot :-D

The problem is that hppa team seems to not allow others than they to
edit their package.use.mask :-/, is there any special reason for it?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]