From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ONmXl-0000ni-F3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:44:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED524E0894; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89C0E07C7 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.80] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONmRT-0001Mq-Ql for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:37:36 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4C14BE03.6080008@gentoo.org> References: <1276248442.17113.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4C14BE03.6080008@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1ivXTcBnXS+Dm9Cbf7v3" Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:43:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1276433026.868.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: 9761c2f4-1b50-4d60-a761-e4a5bb072d87 X-Archives-Hash: 4063fa1fb8ad8880d99e493ee1414586 --=-1ivXTcBnXS+Dm9Cbf7v3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty escribi=C3=B3: > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to > > keep bluez keyworded. > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to > > unmask that USE flag if possible. > >=20 >=20 > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for > their packages. >=20 > Regards, > Petteri >=20 OK, thanks a lot :-D --=-1ivXTcBnXS+Dm9Cbf7v3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwU0oIACgkQCaWpQKGI+9R5LACfXsrZDNYImXa5ao4DJyxvHnNT oTUAnRXpVaBQgSJBohYU0CTmxBjiJFpn =nUCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1ivXTcBnXS+Dm9Cbf7v3--