From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OBima-0000EF-JY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C266E0810; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.fr.smartjog.net (mx.fr.smartjog.net [95.81.144.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F71E0642 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan [192.168.11.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.fr.smartjog.net (Postfix [SmartJog]) with ESMTPS id 89EBB7280A for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (Postfix [SmartJog]) with ESMTP id 3A7A3572BF for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WOWJwrTqgb7L for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naru.perronet.esiee.net (APuteaux-554-1-118-28.w92-154.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.154.21.28]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (Postfix [SmartJog]) with ESMTP id 807D5572BC for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.42.0.5] (su.local [10.42.0.5]) by naru.perronet.esiee.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29D4C1C71 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 08:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling From: Gilles Dartiguelongue To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <87iq6vt2yq.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> References: <1273511472.21605.12.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> <4BE867F2.4030809@gentoo.org> <201005110610.49241.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <201005102352.21751.vapier@gentoo.org> <87iq6vt2yq.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NidCOIkyaaQ5CMgGlnfL" Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:17:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1273558621.3646.2.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 X-Archives-Salt: e07e0748-a67e-4144-bcf2-357531538db2 X-Archives-Hash: 6089acf1c1787443651519a9aa6dc711 --=-NidCOIkyaaQ5CMgGlnfL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mardi 11 mai 2010 =C3=A0 06:35 +0100, Graham Murray a =C3=A9crit : > Mike Frysinger writes: >=20 > > if you're "digging around" then clearly you havent done the obvious and= run=20 > > revdep-rebuild ? that is pretty user-friendly. > I do not know if I had done something wrong beforehand, but "simply" > running revdep-rebuild did not work for me - a number of packages failed > to rebuild during the revdep-rebuild. They were still failing to find > libpng12 during the rebuild while doing gtk-doc scan. In every case, > manually unmerging the package concerned and re-emerging it was > successful. It is as though it was using the scan (which needed > libpng12) from the already installed package in preference to the one it > had built in /var/tmp/portage/... gtk-doc should probably be disabled when rebuilding because a lot of packages probably load already installed library when running gtk-doc scanner which would cause this kind of problem. This has been reported upstream but upstream says gtk-doc using packages should fix LD_LIBRARY_PATH or whatever before running the scanner. In any case, gnome team decided to remove the doc building option in the mid-term so this problem will just vanish. --=20 Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo --=-NidCOIkyaaQ5CMgGlnfL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvo9lwACgkQ1fmVwcYIWAbsfgCfRP0rn1TO5KTw64swR+GQKCfv evIAn0vPRruZ2uY+iRk3dwFkeLq6raHM =640w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NidCOIkyaaQ5CMgGlnfL--