From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:02:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270998170.4030.0@NeddySeagoon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004111616.41414.hwoarang@gentoo.org> (from hwoarang@gentoo.org on Sun Apr 11 14:16:37 2010)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 874 bytes --]
On 2010.04.11 14:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the
> inactive
> council members doesn't look optimal to me
>
> "To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure
> model says
> that if a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up
> for two
> consecutive meetings, they are marked as a slacker."
[snip]
Markos,
Thats from GLEP39. The council has already ruled that they cannot
change GLEP39 without a general vote of all Gentoo devs.
This suggests you need to present your proposals as an amendment to
GLEP39 and that all devs need to vote on it.
Others have already pointed out a few issues with your proposal, so
I'll stop there.
--
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
trustees
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-11 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-11 13:16 [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members Markos Chandras
2010-04-11 13:50 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Markos Chandras
2010-04-11 13:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
2010-04-11 14:04 ` Matti Bickel
2010-04-11 15:17 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-11 16:12 ` Matti Bickel
2010-04-11 15:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-04-11 15:01 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-11 15:02 ` Roy Bamford [this message]
2010-04-11 19:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-11 20:09 ` Rémi Cardona
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270998170.4030.0@NeddySeagoon \
--to=neddyseagoon@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox