From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40727-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1O0xhT-0007z8-En
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:59:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F83EE092B;
	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ganymede.vroon.org (ganymede.vroon.org [195.66.242.11])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39401E0923;
	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:59:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.vroon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09275B81E3;
	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:17:26 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vroon.org
Received: from [192.168.252.2] (5adb8154.bb.sky.com [90.219.129.84])
	(Authenticated sender: tony@vroon.org)
	by ganymede.vroon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0C4CB5B81E2;
	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:17:25 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members
From: "Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <chainsaw@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-council@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <201004111616.41414.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
References: <201004111616.41414.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ohXQJFy0KmeheARv3G0x"
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:48 +0100
Message-ID: <1270994388.2678.2.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 
X-Archives-Salt: 91f9fa9c-41c6-417b-a117-913910a98663
X-Archives-Hash: 19ae49a76ba44c27a28dbdb60acde1c3


--=-ohXQJFy0KmeheARv3G0x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:16 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member
> is active? 0_o

Yes, since council meetings are where the crucial voting happens.
Council members that fail to show up to meetings are not generating the
output we have voted them in for.
Any other opinions they display (be it on mailing lists, IRC, jabber,
radio programs, TV shows) which do not result in a changed vote are
irrelevant.

Regards,
Tony V.

--=-ohXQJFy0KmeheARv3G0x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkvB1dQACgkQp5vW4rUFj5rarwCfcbwvfpKOf13J01xJnPHAnWNR
S2wAn0mp2NMiwnyWhSCL+i4A6Kv05n9H
=UhDW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ohXQJFy0KmeheARv3G0x--