From: Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@rymdraket.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:07:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270462035.21279.13.camel@lillen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270428898.19463.6.camel@localhost>
mån 2010-04-05 klockan 03:54 +0300 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
> The problem is really the RESOLVED connotation and the hiding that goes
> along with that on searches, etc.
>
> The LATER status itself can be useful when used properly (more as
> "ASSIGNED LATER"). In the lack of that some bigger teams might need to
> think of other methods to get things meant for LATER out of main views
> of huge bug lists.
Actually I think this is the best yet.
I have always found the sounding of RESOLVED LATER so harsh. ASSIGNED
LATER would more sound like we know there is a problem, and we know it
should be fixed, but we cannot do it now for different reasons.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 10:03 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-04-03 10:09 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-04-03 10:27 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-04-04 16:55 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2010-04-03 15:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-03 17:10 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 17:54 ` Alec Warner
2010-04-03 18:23 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-05 17:58 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-03 18:58 ` Tiziano Müller
2010-04-03 21:35 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2010-04-03 22:01 ` Alec Warner
2010-04-04 9:05 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-04 9:16 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-04 9:36 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-05 17:54 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-05 20:20 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-05 0:54 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-04-05 10:07 ` Peter Hjalmarsson [this message]
2010-04-06 5:47 ` Rémi Cardona
2010-04-06 7:42 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-04-06 9:46 ` Michał Górny
2010-04-07 22:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-04-11 23:20 ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-12 9:00 ` Petteri Räty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270462035.21279.13.camel@lillen \
--to=xake@rymdraket.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox