public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:58:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270321126.1230.15.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]

Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 12:50 +0300 schrieb Petteri Räty:
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
Yes, please remove it. Keep it simple and stupid. LATER means it's not
resolved and is as such not a valid resolution.

-- 
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility:
  Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
E-Mail   : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5  4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3551 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-03 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-03  9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 10:03 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-04-03 10:09   ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-04-03 10:27     ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-04-04 16:55       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2010-04-03 15:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-03 17:10   ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 17:54     ` Alec Warner
2010-04-03 18:23       ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-05 17:58   ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-03 18:58 ` Tiziano Müller [this message]
2010-04-03 21:35 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2010-04-03 22:01   ` Alec Warner
2010-04-04  9:05   ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-04  9:16     ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-04  9:36       ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-05 17:54       ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-05 20:20         ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-05  0:54 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-04-05 10:07   ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-04-06  5:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Rémi Cardona
2010-04-06  7:42   ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-04-06  9:46   ` Michał Górny
2010-04-07 22:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-04-11 23:20   ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-12  9:00     ` Petteri Räty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1270321126.1230.15.camel@localhost \
    --to=dev-zero@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox