From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40410-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Ny1bX-00081o-10
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:33:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4401CE0BEF;
	Sat,  3 Apr 2010 11:33:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (mx.fr.smartjog.net [91.197.165.186])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0143CE0B68
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  3 Apr 2010 11:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from naru.perronet.esiee.net (APuteaux-554-1-53-116.w90-35.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.35.108.116])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEC857362
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  3 Apr 2010 11:33:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.42.0.7] (keitaro.local [10.42.0.7])
	by naru.perronet.esiee.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDA719FB5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  3 Apr 2010 13:33:16 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com>
References: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:33:16 +0200
Message-ID: <1270294396.15538.2.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 
X-Archives-Salt: f5a2703d-fa0b-464d-afa6-1b24d24f9f53
X-Archives-Hash: 3ff582b57bc0b22d22bed408d4ab3b96


--=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le samedi 03 avril 2010 =C3=A0 12:38 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski a =C3=A9crit :
> There is opt-out suggestion[2], unfortunately it does not provide any inf=
o how=20
> exactly it's supposed to be achieved. As far as portage/pkgcore is concer=
ned,=20
> maybe - as Brian Harring suggested - sandbox could be used to somehow "hi=
de"=20
> preserved libraries or preserved library directory from ebuild environmen=
t=20
> (preserved library directory a'ka "purgatory" - libs could be moved there=
 when=20
> considered orphaned).

that sounds nice, it would allow us to more easily spot
packages/upstreams doing it wrong (maybe that would work for packages
linking to themselves too btw)

--=20
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo

--=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAku3J3wACgkQ1fmVwcYIWAZkmwCbBGKyoe/0PVq4qSfW+OLTBy0y
FQcAnixAu1CKi0Dq/brqg4bOiKWUsA1V
=/Jef
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7--