From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ny1bX-00081o-10 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:33:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4401CE0BEF; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (mx.fr.smartjog.net [91.197.165.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0143CE0B68 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from naru.perronet.esiee.net (APuteaux-554-1-53-116.w90-35.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.35.108.116]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEC857362 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:33:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.42.0.7] (keitaro.local [10.42.0.7]) by naru.perronet.esiee.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDA719FB5 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 13:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries From: Gilles Dartiguelongue To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com> References: <201004031238.18500.reavertm@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7" Organization: Gentoo Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:33:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1270294396.15538.2.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 X-Archives-Salt: f5a2703d-fa0b-464d-afa6-1b24d24f9f53 X-Archives-Hash: 3ff582b57bc0b22d22bed408d4ab3b96 --=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le samedi 03 avril 2010 =C3=A0 12:38 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski a =C3=A9crit : > There is opt-out suggestion[2], unfortunately it does not provide any inf= o how=20 > exactly it's supposed to be achieved. As far as portage/pkgcore is concer= ned,=20 > maybe - as Brian Harring suggested - sandbox could be used to somehow "hi= de"=20 > preserved libraries or preserved library directory from ebuild environmen= t=20 > (preserved library directory a'ka "purgatory" - libs could be moved there= when=20 > considered orphaned). that sounds nice, it would allow us to more easily spot packages/upstreams doing it wrong (maybe that would work for packages linking to themselves too btw) --=20 Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo --=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAku3J3wACgkQ1fmVwcYIWAZkmwCbBGKyoe/0PVq4qSfW+OLTBy0y FQcAnixAu1CKi0Dq/brqg4bOiKWUsA1V =/Jef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yf4V/LS1bo8iFFjCDLB7--