From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NsbSJ-0007Zg-6q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:37:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5B81E0D10; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0F2E0C01 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (unknown [77.246.104.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442401B4091 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org> References: <4B971B38.3070907@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:36:58 +0300 Message-ID: <1269002218.3855.53.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: fa44921f-da6a-4480-838c-f25fe9d3aec8 X-Archives-Hash: 59053ac191160a5efed215937139c723 =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 10/03/2010 =D0=B2 05:08 +0100, Sebastian Pippi= ng =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > How about a monthly bumpday? Good idea, but it should follow our policy to inform maintainers _in advance_: e.g. on first bumpday to work on bumps and notify maintainer about this work by attaching final ebuild to the version bump bug with clear message that you are going to bump and, _next month_ on bumpday it's Ok to commit this ebuild to the tree. Just picking bugs and bumping them straight to the tree without knowing why maintainer haven't done that yet is a bad idea. --=20 Peter.