From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:36:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268383017.6834.14.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e117dbb91003111420w656ec61ax677b65737ea02027@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1996 bytes --]
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
> >
> > I suggest reading my comments...
>
> Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this
> thread.
The subthread got renamed to more fit its purpose.
> If you mean the thread you started that tangentially took off from this
> one, about eselect profile improvements: I support that proposal,
> but it will take some time to get implemented. Is anyone already
> working on that?
>
> In the meantime I see no reason for that to halt or postpone the
> current desktop profile improvements as prepared by Theo.
I argued that it's a bad idea to add yet more profiles, when we could
avoid that (while even improving things additionally).
But I guess I'll have to bring some direct points why I think
implementing the alternative as I described ASAP is better than ever
doing this gnome/kde subprofile thing:
* The split desktop profile plan retroactively modifies 2008.0 and 10.0
profiles. Not a good thing for obvious reasons. (Of course the
subprofiles could also be added together with a new release, as proposed
for the alternative idea)
* Adding yet more subprofiles, increasing repoman and pcheck time,
possibly confusing users (migration things; changing USE flags in a
perceived stable release profile leading to unexpected --newuse
triggering, etc)
* Making it harder to get both GNOME and KDE things out of a profile
(though the common things in desktop profile right now is quite
suboptimal for GNOME)
* Putting the problem of suboptimal subprofiles handling under the
carpet again, greatly reducing the motivation for people to work on the
alternative better proposal
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: leio@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 14:52 [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-04 15:29 ` Jeremy Olexa
2010-03-04 17:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-04 17:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-04 18:15 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-03-04 22:36 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 8:28 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-05 12:57 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-05 13:46 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-05 17:59 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-05 19:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-03-05 19:11 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-05 19:24 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-03-05 19:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2010-03-08 1:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-11 1:36 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-11 20:20 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-11 22:20 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-12 8:36 ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2010-03-12 9:48 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-12 17:39 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-13 10:07 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-13 23:37 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-12 15:47 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-12 17:34 ` Duncan
2010-03-13 23:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-23 14:29 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-03-08 17:13 ` [gentoo-dev] Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review) Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-08 22:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-03-08 22:44 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-13 21:16 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-14 0:02 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-03-14 5:25 ` Brian Harring
2010-03-09 1:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268383017.6834.14.camel@localhost \
--to=leio@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox