From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpVO2-0005mm-QC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:32:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABF66E0B98; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.fr.smartjog.net (mx.fr.smartjog.net [91.197.165.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68C6E0B02 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from naru.perronet.esiee.net (APuteaux-554-1-20-249.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.205.51.249]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.fr.smartjog.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA0F57563 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:32:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.42.0.7] (keitaro.local [10.42.0.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by naru.perronet.esiee.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 940B3C150E for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:32:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events From: Gilles Dartiguelongue To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4B982596.2080606@gentoo.org> References: <201003100745.21823.vapier@gentoo.org> <4B982596.2080606@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-m9xfShX25U3ikoLgO9b0" Organization: Gentoo Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:32:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1268263931.3377.1.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 X-Archives-Salt: d0cdf863-ab4b-4ee3-949d-03262b687db6 X-Archives-Hash: fcd6896c0db4b8a4f9d437a6a497e1c9 --=-m9xfShX25U3ikoLgO9b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mercredi 10 mars 2010 =C3=A0 18:04 -0500, Richard Freeman a =C3=A9crit : > On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote: > > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at leas= t > > if they want calendar access? > > > > What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them wi= th > > search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and > > whatever ad serving might leak thru, and object to having a gmail accou= nt > > on principle? > > >=20 > Honestly, Google calendar works well enough that I'm not sure that I=20 > like the idea of re-inventing the wheel. Maybe if somebody designed=20 > some kind of open calendar access protocol that was comparable. >=20 > If you don't like Google tracking all that you do, create a gmail=20 > account and don't use it for ANYTHING but Google Calendar. That will=20 > greatly limit the amount of database correlation they can do. >=20 > If somebody has a suggestion for a reasonable multi-user calendaring=20 > infrastructure that has reasonably close feature parity and isn't a bear=20 > to maintain I'm sure it would be considered. that's called caldav. There's at least one opensource server that is working decently well with evolution although it's in php. --=20 Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo --=-m9xfShX25U3ikoLgO9b0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuYK/cACgkQ1fmVwcYIWAafWQCgzhDdrBeXFAqoZXDyigzDyDzS QpwAoMgVbEtIPjFt/yiZp0/ZpNOM5I0d =OwTJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-m9xfShX25U3ikoLgO9b0--