From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268241833.20941.14.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org>
Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 22:32 -0600, Nathan Zachary a écrit :
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
> >
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their
> > maintainers in Gentoo.
For gnome assigned bumps, I can tell all of them have a reason/policy
that explains why they are not done yet and I definitively don't want
non-maintainer bumps for them.
> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the
> status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as
> well.
That I would buy. I often hear users complaining that stable isn't that
stable and they try to mix ~arch or completely move to ~arch instead of
asking for stablereq. Here too gnome has a policy for some packages but
a couple of them can be stabilized independently. Either way the
reaction is generally quick.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 4:08 [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 4:32 ` Nathan Zachary
2010-03-10 5:00 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-10 5:17 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 13:59 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-10 18:50 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 22:34 ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-10 17:23 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue [this message]
2010-03-10 12:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-03-10 14:41 ` Mark Loeser
2010-03-10 15:02 ` Markos Chandras
2010-03-10 17:43 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 18:11 ` Alec Warner
2010-03-11 5:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-03-19 12:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Volkov
2010-03-21 0:58 ` Sebastian Pipping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268241833.20941.14.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj \
--to=eva@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox