public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:23:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268241833.20941.14.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9720D6.6010702@gentoo.org>

Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 22:32 -0600, Nathan Zachary a écrit :
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > 
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump
> > 
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their
> > maintainers in Gentoo.

For gnome assigned bumps, I can tell all of them have a reason/policy
that explains why they are not done yet and I definitively don't want
non-maintainer bumps for them.

> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the
> status of the tree.  Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as
> well.

That I would buy. I often hear users complaining that stable isn't that
stable and they try to mix ~arch or completely move to ~arch instead of
asking for stablereq. Here too gnome has a policy for some packages but
a couple of them can be stabilized independently. Either way the
reaction is generally quick.

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10  4:08 [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10  4:32 ` Nathan Zachary
2010-03-10  5:00   ` Joshua Saddler
2010-03-10  5:17     ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 13:59       ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-10 18:50         ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 22:34           ` Ben de Groot
2010-03-10 17:23   ` Gilles Dartiguelongue [this message]
2010-03-10 12:35 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-03-10 14:41   ` Mark Loeser
2010-03-10 15:02     ` Markos Chandras
2010-03-10 17:43     ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-03-10 18:11     ` Alec Warner
2010-03-11  5:58     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-03-19 12:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Volkov
2010-03-21  0:58   ` Sebastian Pipping

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1268241833.20941.14.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj \
    --to=eva@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox