From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTbzq-0004nC-5D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:08:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8687E0946 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 14:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F68E07C3 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.151.197] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NTbnP-00084I-3H for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:56:03 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <7c612fc61001071459g3ec69283oa78eeccd9975c0ec@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100101183144.457D1642DC@smtp.gentoo.org> <1262456465.15166.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7c612fc61001071459g3ec69283oa78eeccd9975c0ec@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-h6pH/EVl+/5JL+yFRu63" Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:58:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1263045488.2681.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es X-Archives-Salt: 41eb4db4-caa8-4baf-be78-8cb81bbd6f58 X-Archives-Hash: a460db49f00d99eec0267a0d57fa174e --=-h6pH/EVl+/5JL+yFRu63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El jue, 07-01-2010 a las 15:59 -0700, Denis Dupeyron escribi=C3=B3: > 2010/1/2 Pacho Ramos : > > [...] I failed to see if, finally, an approval > > from the council is needed for merging [multilib] to portage-2.2 or not >=20 > The only approval that's required to merge anything to an official > portage branch is Zac's (zmedico). He may have to follow some rules > and wait for some vote from the council when for example EAPIs are > concerned but whether to merge code or not is his decision and > responsibility. That said I've never seen him refusing to merge > anything that was worth it. >=20 > > if [multilib] will be discussed finally on this meeting. >=20 > Technically we don't need to (I'll explain that in another email) but > we may. I'm just starting to work on the agenda for the 18th and I > don't have everything in place yet. >=20 > Denis. >=20 OK, thanks a lot for the information :-) Best regards --=-h6pH/EVl+/5JL+yFRu63 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktIi3AACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SuQwCeI7P6Fy2j9qSFlXvvG7Ydgrav sVwAoIdPCFH0+j+XOjxvKiF+LEt9xKeo =R/xu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-h6pH/EVl+/5JL+yFRu63--