From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLyW1-0008AN-6w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:34:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15067E0517; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BE8E0517 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so2991405fxm.26 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qWj9xSeuc/+hbeKupPUoNuQk+t0nxt4XbThREenq1M4=; b=r/+gPtQVbb76Ber4JDK38aN8qINrgrg3bCtptgo2vNT5tdCIYrP0THGuAiAtNOKDvQ 0gyfaVEaYH5Fxdvs+bzrCvBgJxYibIq54igy0KWuJmntHm8V7eyBbLzvo7ygh3oe94pU cYW4/IBiFnXRERrXQ2fpT/vhQrb2bwxnvCExk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=D7mBdEni5KhtJmJtGWIfWUyZg7U18WFyyt7fzMpl6fTHAGcOifmE2CbPpVVuRdutRT 1/6cy8MeVBAWcw+9u/Umiff/ISaR1sdd0juIADgl9z1kuH/opmdYe86sVmqdGhVRgKvp y0XnPTTg4eXOd7vPi8kuTwjd/casJxZdq89ck= Received: by 10.223.55.152 with SMTP id u24mr6477058fag.24.1261226023559; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.28.0.2? (static-82-85-117-87.clienti.tiscali.it [82.85.117.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm1340543fxm.9.2009.12.19.04.33.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:33:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rewritten epatch From: Diego Elio =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= To: Brian Harring Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, patrick@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20091219075655.GA9950@hrair> References: <200912181407.47924.vapier@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad0912182336s42524ac3ka1105121bd477157@mail.gmail.com> <20091219075655.GA9950@hrair> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:33:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1261226013.8288.29.camel@yamato> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 82e0bee6-2f5e-49d2-b730-e4595a0a52a1 X-Archives-Hash: 54d1b751c7a0354274abceeaed7f2d2f Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto: >=20 > For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world=20 > test run makes a lot of sense.=20 I can put it into run with the tinderbox, no problem with that. But I think that we should really use both: Patrick's should be better for I/O so maybe you (or Zac) can come up with a script to just try unpack and prepare phases for all ebuilds rather than keeping the whole merge=E2=80=A6 --=20 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/