From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38777-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NKp0p-00060U-T8
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:13:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EE1DE0C72
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:13:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9A5E0899
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35] (unknown [77.246.104.171])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956D767DBC
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:30:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics
 mandatory?
From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20091215185944.GA9600@gentoo.org>
References: <20091215185944.GA9600@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:29:07 +0300
Message-ID: <1260944947.29419.156.camel@tablet>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 202bdf0c-dbee-48a2-87fd-87c4bc787411
X-Archives-Hash: ba82866e2639b4ea21ecb20ba428e306

=D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 15/12/2009 =D0=B2 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen =
=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
>   Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make th=
e
>   use of that support mandatory or optional?

I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there is
no need to bother and create illusion that it does.

> (I can post all the answers to the Prefix quiz)

I think this is good idea in any case. Could you post this (on -core, of
course)?


--=20
Peter.