From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38685-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NGrUY-0002Dg-FZ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:03:56 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D4BAE07F0
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 10:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1031E078D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:32:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B767F2D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:32:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for
 ruby-based packages
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
References: <1259737917.26974.8.camel@localhost>
	 <20091202095125.2e300c55@gentoo.org>
	 <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2Y+IveW6kkXzommrC2I7"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:32:45 +0100
Message-ID: <1260005565.8760.7.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
X-Archives-Salt: 781a1089-62e6-4d73-9463-e740c92b5995
X-Archives-Hash: 311a74eb68cd6498a895ff9b0a782f31


--=-2Y+IveW6kkXzommrC2I7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:57 +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote:
> Dne st=C5=99eda 02 Prosinec 2009 09:51:25 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a):
> >  At the moment I don't remember for what reason exactly, but we renamed
> > the PATCHES variable to EBZR_PATCHES in bzr.eclass.  You should do
> > something similar.
> No reason to rename it if they use base_src_prepare

We handle the patches ourselves and also in a non-standard way since we
may apply them to multiple copies of the source tree, so I have renamed
this to RUBY_PATCHES to be on the safe side.

Kind regards,

Hans

--=-2Y+IveW6kkXzommrC2I7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAksaKLwACgkQVYU2Ai8K93c+8gCgz1Er3bDp9WWNCz9jfU8JEB8C
n7AAoKv4WW5s85+ua2RXQWWyT1n+DX/v
=heXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-2Y+IveW6kkXzommrC2I7--