From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38684-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1NGrTM-0001G6-AV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:02:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6E48E07E3 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18029E0790 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D76427B for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20091202104632.GA5853@gentoo.org> References: <1259737917.26974.8.camel@localhost> <20091202095125.2e300c55@gentoo.org> <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org> <20091202104632.GA5853@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le" Organization: Gentoo Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:59:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1260003599.8760.4.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-Archives-Salt: b8350177-01c5-4673-acd6-81513e1fd56c X-Archives-Hash: d09092a83a440e016667cc00871a7687 --=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:46 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: > I guess you better add a section for known eapis that are too old to > your liking, and use the *) section for an oops message saying you don't > know about ${EAPI} yet, and to please file a bug. Yes, good idea. We've gone with this solution. Kind regards, Hans --=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAksaIQ8ACgkQVYU2Ai8K93drBQCdEfIEHDoH8G/Rpmn21TNYhSWV ZTsAn29WaH/yLRi90kqdYYpXvEU2Jofs =+47X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le--