From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38684-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NGrTM-0001G6-AV
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:02:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6E48E07E3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 10:02:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18029E0790
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:00:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D76427B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 Dec 2009 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for
 ruby-based packages
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20091202104632.GA5853@gentoo.org>
References: <1259737917.26974.8.camel@localhost>
	 <20091202095125.2e300c55@gentoo.org>
	 <200912020957.40895.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
	 <20091202104632.GA5853@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:59:59 +0100
Message-ID: <1260003599.8760.4.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
X-Archives-Salt: b8350177-01c5-4673-acd6-81513e1fd56c
X-Archives-Hash: d09092a83a440e016667cc00871a7687


--=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:46 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:

> I guess you better add a section for known eapis that are too old to
> your liking, and use the *) section for an oops message saying you don't
> know about ${EAPI} yet, and to please file a bug.

Yes, good idea. We've gone with this solution.

Kind regards,

Hans

--=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAksaIQ8ACgkQVYU2Ai8K93drBQCdEfIEHDoH8G/Rpmn21TNYhSWV
ZTsAn29WaH/yLRi90kqdYYpXvEU2Jofs
=+47X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Y3gUQkFxbt4Qmj3Zf3le--