From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N79fO-00086g-4F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:26:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE91EE0918; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A2E0918 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (unknown [77.246.104.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC0F67450 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse: - New directory From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200911080940.47551.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4AE6D916.1030902@gentoo.org> <4AF6C90E.8060302@gentoo.org> <200911080940.47551.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:25:56 +0300 Message-ID: <1257693956.8341.1433.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 123f5351-bd54-4207-9eb5-651e2d6593d9 X-Archives-Hash: 5dc5be47804541bca336ac5c0eb0390a =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=81=D0=BA, 08/11/2009 =D0=B2 09:40 -0500, Mike Frysinger = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Sunday 08 November 2009 08:35:10 Joe Sapp wrote: > > Samuli Suominen wrote: > > > Joe Sapp (nixphoeni) wrote: > > >> nixphoeni 09/10/27 11:21:25 > > >> > > >> Log: Directory /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse a= dded > > >> to the repository > > > > > > Since when did we start adding "big letters" to other than perl > > > -categories? > > > > > > *Very* ugly. > >=20 > > Sorry about that, I thought it was a valid package name. I did it be= cause > > it better reflects the upstream naming schemes. I suppose I could s= top > > and move the few I've done so far back to all lowercase if there's e= nough > > consensus. >=20 > it is a valid package name. if it makes your life easier, you're allow= ed to=20 > use the name. some people prefer to normalize everything lowercase -- = if=20 > they're maintaining the package, they're free to do that. Until it was decided differently, no, it's not: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3D3&chap=3D= 1#doc_chap3 "The first subsection, pkg, is the package name, which should only contain lowercase letters, the digits 0-9, and any number of single hyphen (-), underscore (_) or plus (+) characters." --=20 Peter.