From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-38393-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N6luA-0002nS-G1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:04:38 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCD63E0A8A;
	Sat,  7 Nov 2009 14:04:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.fr.smartjog.net (unknown [91.197.165.186])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2140E0A8A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2009 14:04:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mx.fr.smartjog.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083B8574FB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2009 15:04:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smartjog.com
Received: from mx.fr.smartjog.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.dmz-ext.fr.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id zliB30slZkmP for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sat,  7 Nov 2009 15:04:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from naru.perronet.esiee.net (APuteaux-552-1-26-3.w90-61.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.61.137.3])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx.fr.smartjog.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DF257503
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2009 15:04:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.42.0.5] (su.local [10.42.0.5])
	by naru.perronet.esiee.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CD684B1B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2009 15:04:30 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in
 sys-block/gparted: gparted-0.4.3.ebuild
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1257597103.13820.7.camel@genbox>
References: <E1N6htn-0004hw-Hu@stork.gentoo.org>
	 <1257594939.3995.2.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net>
	 <4AF5625E.7010005@gentoo.org>  <1257597103.13820.7.camel@genbox>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Zq7N/oo8Kif344aU3sdZ"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:04:26 +0100
Message-Id: <1257602666.7811.2.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 
X-Archives-Salt: 4a870a16-3f2e-4642-90e9-7bd6c82c1ee2
X-Archives-Hash: ebc5ee2fb9d644341a333b3b5ead9c2b


--=-Zq7N/oo8Kif344aU3sdZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le samedi 07 novembre 2009 =C3=A0 13:31 +0100, Romain Perier a =C3=A9crit :
> In the future , please have a discussion on IRC, that's a bit more
> "constructive". I meant why "flood" on ML for that if we can discuss on
> IRC together ? We're adults or nop ? (I already said that to ssuominen
> on #-kde).

email is a valid method of communication, I'm not in front of my
computer all day long... I see no "flood" either, reviews are meant to
be sent to gentoo-dev. Look for yourself when you hit reply-to button on
a message from gentoo-commits list.

--=20
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo

--=-Zq7N/oo8Kif344aU3sdZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkr1fmoACgkQ1fmVwcYIWAZEwgCgup7Hpy4f2LDPz7msrK9AHoyf
OJUAnR27pfOIZUxDFycZSCtCL1YOMqDc
=ix3m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Zq7N/oo8Kif344aU3sdZ--