From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6fdR-0001jn-ML for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:22:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2BB2E084A; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A58E084A for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D973B66A53 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations From: Hans de Graaff To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4AF4A891.3080503@gentoo.org> References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org> <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> <4AF1EBD8.4020502@gentoo.org> <20091104214823.64842abd@gentoo.org> <20091105091700.GA17478@eric.schwarzvogel.de> <4AF331B0.4020108@gentoo.org> <8b4c83ad0911060618r2b61c4b4w51238306b9c9a437@mail.gmail.com> <20091106144535.GT1150@gentoo.org> <4AF4A891.3080503@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FVrP5zHqDmN7bAph6g4G" Organization: Gentoo Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1257578571.1532.21.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-Archives-Salt: 64f66220-4ed3-4aa4-87d8-0202b1b651b1 X-Archives-Hash: 3af83f67b0912d47ac3cbf782e925fbf --=-FVrP5zHqDmN7bAph6g4G Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 23:52 +0100, R=C3=A9mi Cardona wrote: > I just don't see how "noarch" will help the portage tree. I would propose to use it for the 100+ app-xemacs packages, all of which run within the virtual machine that is xemacs. Obviously app-editors/xemacs, the editor itself, will still be keyworded for each arch, but the chance of running into arch-specific issues with the packages is very small, and they are released independently from the editor. The same thing may apply to a number of dev-ruby/* packages (those installing only ruby code), but that would need per-package investigation. Hans --=-FVrP5zHqDmN7bAph6g4G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEUEABECAAYFAkr1IEsACgkQVYU2Ai8K93fuaQCWM+zzZd8Lytrhvw1G+5U4V6jk XQCgi3NgZlEbxx1eSqcAYLLUTZEO0AE= =SDvY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FVrP5zHqDmN7bAph6g4G--