From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5nrX-0001eV-NF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:57:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01F2CE0B3F; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.jazztel.es (smtp02.jazztel.es [62.14.3.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C21E0B3F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.222.150.140] (helo=[192.168.1.201]) by smtp02.jazztel.es with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5nr2-0004Wh-Om for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:57:24 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4AF1F6C0.6000902@gmail.com> References: <4AD8D301.7020903@gentoo.org> <1255775174.2212.1393.camel@tablet> <4AD99DE5.7060701@gentoo.org> <4AF1778D.2060905@gmail.com> <4AF187BE.9030601@gmail.com> <4AF1F6C0.6000902@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:57:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1257371867.14013.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 X-AntiSpam-Checked: Passed : Threshold - 0.0 : SA jazztel.es X-Virus-Checked: Passed : Kaspersky at jazztel.es Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 0b845842-88b8-47e4-b133-9d3eaffb6df8 X-Archives-Hash: 88d44041c0c794cdc0139ff819c2382d El mi=C3=A9, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribi=C3=B3: > Ben de Groot wrote: > > 2009/11/4 Dale : > > =20 > >> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? > >> =20 > > > > This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. > > I can't think of a valid reason why you would not use that overlay. > > =20 >=20 > Because I don't want one more thing to have to deal with. Gentoo is > enough fun already.=20 >=20 But, why do you think having kde3 stuff hardmasked in main tree in unmaintained state will be better than having it on a external overlay? :-/ Also, think about gnome users (like me) that will not need to download all kde3 ebuilds on every sync :-) Yes, maybe they aren't so much but I still fail to see why do you think that preserving kde3 hardmasked is better than using an overlay=20 Regards