From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mucvn-0002AS-E9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:04:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1BBEE05D5; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983A8E05D5 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402276703F for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:04:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.564 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.564 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id abom5yIXkGLe for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BB5676C1 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MucvY-0002Ci-2N for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:52 +0200 Received: from liten.csbnet.se ([95.80.45.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:52 +0200 Received: from xake by liten.csbnet.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Peter Hjalmarsson Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED="1" in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults? Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1254708208.6650.18.camel@lillen.dodi> References: <4AC7A277.7040300@gentoo.org> <20091003142123.4ea712b2@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: liten.csbnet.se In-Reply-To: <20091003142123.4ea712b2@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.0 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 9212d17d-f729-49e8-8712-e1c11790c9c5 X-Archives-Hash: 45cab7e8e77d1fbc1215ebf6477348a6 l=C3=B6r 2009-10-03 klockan 14:21 -0600 skrev Ryan Hill: > On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300 > Samuli Suominen wrote: >=20 > > Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=3D"1" to force ld behave > > asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles? > >=20 > > Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea. > >=20 > > Thanks, Samuli > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > I think it's a not terrible idea. >=20 >=20 > Only barely related: can we enable FEATURES=3Dtest too? >=20 For FEATURES=3D"test" a policy for how to handle stuff like: if use test; then elog ewarn "You have unit tests enabled, this results in an insecure library" ewarn "It is recommended that you reinstall *without* FEATURES=3Dtest" fi [1] needs to be formed before enabling it anywhere by default. Should this test= really be run by default, or should it be shielded by USE=3D"unsafetests" = or something of just restricted? My 2 cents. [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/dbus/dbus-1.3.= 0.ebuild?rev=3D1.5&view=3Dmarkup and scroll to the bottom.=20 //Peter Hjalmarsson