Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

["Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1299 bytes --]

Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 23:55 -0600 schrieb Ryan Hill:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
> > Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already
> > > handles it right).
> > 
> > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose
> > it for EAPI 4 if you want that.
> 
> Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)?  Portage has supported this
> for quite a while now.  Does the current PMS disallow it?
> 
> What I've really wanted for a long time is different package.mask files for
> different types of masks.  eg.
> 
> package.mask/broken.mask (qa.mask?)
> package.mask/removal.mask
> package.mask/security.mask
> package.mask/testing.mask

To avoid collision with the current package.mask I'd prefer
package.mask.d/ for the directory. Also makes the transition easy since
we can generate package.mask out of the files in package.mask.d/.

-- 
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility:
  Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
E-Mail   : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5  4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30

[-- Attachment #1.2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3551 bytes --]