From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31536 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Apr 2003 14:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21377 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 14:50:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:49:48 -0700 From: Max Kalika To: Daniel Armyr , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <1250000.1051627788@[192.168.23.6]> In-Reply-To: <3EAE8AC3.8060603@home.se> References: <20030429001443.GA413@time> <20030429011644.GB18711@lucien.dreaming> <20030429033239.GB413@time> <200304290224.53881.novas007@gmx.net> <1051598177.1819.32.camel@bunyip.uwa.edu.au> <1620000.1051624615@[192.168.23.6]> <3EAE8AC3.8060603@home.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new local USE var: vim-with-x X-Archives-Salt: 3ae26e78-7c34-4171-851c-eee6775433d3 X-Archives-Hash: ccd52f51c592ee047b93997b360e165c Quoting Daniel Armyr : >| This is yet another reason why portage needs to have support for USE >| flags to be applied on a per-package basis. > > Hm, I love the way the USE flags are working, but I definatey think it > is time to look over the system. I think we have scaled it up as far as > it goes soon, and Gentoo isn't exactly shrinking. Well, fortunately this doesn't change the way "stock" USE flags are handled. The per-package stuff is optional for finer-grained control of your installed apps. ---max kalika --max@lsit.ucsb.edu -lsit systems administrator -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list