Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

["Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3764 bytes --]

Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2009, 16:40 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2009.06.28 10:00, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 07:15 -0600 schrieb Denis Dupeyron:
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben de Groot<yngwin@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > To appoint as proxy for a council meeting someone who has been
> > booted
> > > > from Gentoo is a clear lapse of judgement, and would in my eyes
> > > > disqualify the involved council member from functioning in that
> > position.
> > > 
> > > As Petteri noted it's not obvious that GLEP39 disallows choosing a
> > > non-dev as proxy for a council meeting. I haven't talked to 
> > Tiziano,
> > > and I don't know what he had in mind when he chose ciaranm as his
> > > proxy, but I'd be ready to believe part of it was that he wanted to
> > > experiment.
> > Well, it was surely not an experiment to see whether someone must be 
> > a
> > dev or not to be a proxy. Based on GLEP 39 it was fairly clear to me
> > this must not be the case and I at least expected the council to
> > accept
> > him (or any other non-dev) at least for that meeting.
> > 
> [snip]
> > -- 
> > Tiziano Müller
> > Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
> > Areas of responsibility:
> >   Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
> > E-Mail   : dev-zero@gentoo.org
> > GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5  4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
> > 
> 
> Its my opinion that the concept of proxies in council meetings is 
> fatally flawed.  

As I stated in at least one mail before (and in countless discussions on
IRC): I'd like to see the proxy-concept being removed since it is flawed
as you point out below and replaced with something like "a council
member may miss N meetings with M of them without prior notice"
And then remove that slacker mark as well and just say: "if you miss
more than those N meetings or miss M meetings without prior notice you
get kicked". And for those who like the slacker mark to see who has
missed a lot of meetings or missed meetings repeatedly we could have a
statistics summary on proj/en/council with the number of missed meetings
per member.

Cheers,
Tiziano

> 1. The brief (if any) that the proxy is given by the council member 
> being proxied is never made public. 
> 
> 2. Its never clear if the proxy is voting as instructed by the council 
> member or as they see fit at the time.
> 
> What if an entire meeting and therefore any votes were staffed by 
> entirely by non gentoo developer proxies?
> Unlikely, but perfectly possible under GLEP39. Would Gentoo feel bound 
> by decisions that such a meeting reached?
> 
> Oh. Don't talk about 'common sense' GLEP39 does not mention it, so it 
> doesn't count ... and its much rarer than you may think.
> 
> Lastly, as a trustee and partly legally responsible for decisions made 
> on behalf of Gentoo, I am uneasy with the concept of non developers 
> making those decisions. Now reread my 'what if' above with that 
> liability in mind.
> 
> Note: Other trustees may have a different view of the world
> 
> - -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Roy Bamford
> (NeddySeagoon) a member of
> gentoo-ops
> forum-mods
> treecleaners
> trustees
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkpHjtYACgkQTE4/y7nJvavn9gCgt5tw0IaT8GRdh2w0nY+RskZF
> H2YAoMgphYWUOp4bVMl8TWp0Qy1nTzjI
> =aR8L
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
Areas of responsibility:
  Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
E-Mail   : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5  4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30

[-- Attachment #1.2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3551 bytes --]