From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-36689-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MIsdV-00062p-S7
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:09:14 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33797E051C;
	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.44])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075BAE051C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520934DD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:09:11 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at estpak.ee
Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (MXR-5.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id LxlFqDRIbbn7 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:09:10 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from Relayhost1.neti.ee (Relayhost1 [88.196.174.141])
	by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0227C1EE9D8
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:09:10 +0300 (EEST)
X-SMTP-Auth-NETI-Businesmail: no
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25
From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20090622212310.6d717792@snowcone>
References: <20090622191805.GA4213@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net>
	 <19007.58859.469824.277869@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <20090622212310.6d717792@snowcone>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hBHqLc+gNiYqob1h4ZKN"
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:09:12 +0300
Message-Id: <1245712152.15486.3.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 
X-Archives-Salt: 28ed53e4-0f80-4f2e-81aa-62615fd3867d
X-Archives-Hash: 310662e3a4959eec60436a9c8e8b77d3


--=-hBHqLc+gNiYqob1h4ZKN
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On E, 2009-06-22 at 21:23 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:13:31 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > | (so that certain people can't vote and discuss things based upon
> > | what they think the feature is without bothering to find out if it's
> > | anything to do with what they assume).
> >=20
> > Of course that's not desirable. But can you give a concrete example
> > where such a thing happened?
>=20
> Yup. Some of leio's huge drawn out objections to EAPI 3 that wasted
> huge amounts of my time were based upon him only having read the short
> name we chose for things.

Thanks for your very detailed concrete examples where such a thing
happened.
And I'm sorry to have wasted your precious time by doing the opposite of
what you claim here and still objecting to things that don't make sense.

Now lets get back to useful things, like giving "code names" that make
sense and don't need to be looked up with what is actually meant when
they are being referred to in short names.


--=20
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: leio@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

--=-hBHqLc+gNiYqob1h4ZKN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkpADxgACgkQkeYb6olFHJeGMQCgqJ+503CliK0JoBl+v2pQeVBA
hzgAnirkIL4HLo0Z+E75rXO3axei77BQ
=w+ea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-hBHqLc+gNiYqob1h4ZKN--