public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re:[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2
       [not found] <20090607163041.09a1452e@anaconda.krait.us>
@ 2009-06-08 15:48 ` Ferris McCormick
  2009-06-08 20:24   ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Bamford
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ferris McCormick @ 2009-06-08 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo Developers

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1057 bytes --]

O
> 
> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:31:47 +0100
> From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2
> 
> 
> - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
> 
> I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and 
> added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version.
> 
> The HTML version (not with the GLEP style sheet) is at 
> http://xrl.us/bevrnb (my devspace)
> Its not ready to go to council as it still needs additional content 
> which I don't have the background to contribuite. My role in this 
> version of GLEP 55 has been interpretation and editorial.
> 

Very small point.  There is a difference between "EAPI in the file name
extension" and just "EAPI in the file name".  I think the intent here is
the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it seems.

Regards,
Ferris
-- 
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@gentoo.org>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2
  2009-06-08 15:48 ` Re:[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2 Ferris McCormick
@ 2009-06-08 20:24   ` Roy Bamford
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roy Bamford @ 2009-06-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2009.06.08 16:48, Ferris McCormick wrote:
[snip]

> Very small point.  There is a difference between "EAPI in the file
> name
> extension" and just "EAPI in the file name".  I think the intent here
> is
> the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it seems.
> 
> Regards,
> Ferris
> -- 
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@gentoo.org>
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
> 
Ferris,

Its not a small point, it makes quite a difference.  In most places the 
glep should talk about "EAPI in the file name", not "EAPI in the file 
name extension".

dev-zero got to me first on that and I need to update the glep.

- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkotc4EACgkQTE4/y7nJvatWFwCeIyq5Ks/WzTUImTJXaoRQG5Pc
x5QAnjOm+jfgQ5/3vBqJyPsRDOtc6YCF
=yoel
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-08 20:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20090607163041.09a1452e@anaconda.krait.us>
2009-06-08 15:48 ` Re:[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2 Ferris McCormick
2009-06-08 20:24   ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Bamford

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox