From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MD4Qk-0001tV-Gr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:32:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95377E02E6; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.140]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DEBE02E6 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=NeddySeagoon) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MD4Qi-0003CH-Li for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:32:00 +0000 Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:31:47 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.0 Message-Id: <1244327519.3832.1@NeddySeagoon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: 74c43567-40e5-44fa-84d5-4721a411e198 X-Archives-Hash: 3fb6cf66a73b1e2c0f6026674226c241 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ladies and Gentlemen, I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and=20 added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version. The HTML version (not with the GLEP style sheet) is at=20 http://xrl.us/bevrnb (my devspace) Its not ready to go to council as it still needs additional content=20 which I don't have the background to contribuite. My role in this=20 version of GLEP 55 has been interpretation and editorial. I'm looking for three elements to add. 1. A description of the steps the PM needs to extract the EAPI in=20 ebuilds today, if its any more than sourcing the ebuild. 2. Benchmarks and supporting code for EAPI extraction for EAPI in the=20 filename. 3. Benchmarks and supporting code for EAPI extraction for EAPI in the=20 ebuild. Benchmarks for valid and invalid cache need to be supplied so we have=20 both the user and developer views of performace.=20 I expect items 2 and 3 to be provided by the proponents of these two=20 competing options and critically examined for validity by the=20 competitors. When the above data is available, I'll update the document as it needs=20 to contain all of the evidence to allow council to reach a decision=20 without reading the ml.=20 Reply with corrections and factual additions with supporting evidence=20 only please. The role of the GLEP is to present the evidence and make a=20 reccomendation. Its councils job to make any subjective assessments=20 having read the GLEP. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoq7l8ACgkQTE4/y7nJvatqjQCeNe/mqS8goPZ5+H4yftn19mYJ 5i0AoLwsAmKcc6Ux4zjG3dExgRbcltwl =3DedR+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----