From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:49:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243950582.11496.9.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A24BE43.4020507@trelane.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 01:53 -0400 schrieb Andrew D Kirch:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
> > weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
> > senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
> > GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sense coming of them.
> > It's taken me a little bit to step up and put a stop to it but I fully
> > intend on putting a stop to it. The point of the council meetings is
> > to bring up a topic and decide on its merits whether it should be
> > brought into the Gentoo Project or not. I quote from the first line of
> > the Gentoo Council website:
> I would strongly advice that EAPI-3 and GLEP's 54/55 be dropped at least
> for the time being (at a minimum 90 days). The argument has left any
> trappings of merit or rational behind, and has replaced them with
> religion. As this is now a dogmatic issue a resolution cannot be
> reached at this time.
> >
> > We have all collectively failed the Gentoo Project since we have not
> > been doing this for the past several weeks.
>
> Vigorous debate fails no one. Religious zealotry however fails us all.
> In recognizing that this is what's happening iwth EAPI-3, and GLEP's
> 54/55 is the first step towards moving on to a new and fair debate on
> these issues down the road.
Why are you mentioning EAPI-3 here? That topic got closed two meetings
ago.
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
Areas of responsibility:
Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 4:15 [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format Doug Goldstein
2009-06-02 5:10 ` Arun Raghavan
2009-06-02 5:53 ` Andrew D Kirch
2009-06-02 13:49 ` Tiziano Müller [this message]
2009-06-02 5:59 ` Robin H. Johnson
2009-06-02 6:30 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-06-02 16:05 ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-06-02 18:02 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-06-02 18:59 ` Petteri Räty
2009-06-02 21:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-06-03 19:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Piotr Jaroszyński
2009-06-04 14:27 ` Doug Goldstein
2009-06-04 16:42 ` Richard Freeman
2009-06-03 21:41 ` Denis Dupeyron
2009-06-04 2:31 ` Richard Freeman
2009-06-04 14:20 ` Doug Goldstein
2009-06-04 14:29 ` Denis Dupeyron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243950582.11496.9.camel@localhost \
--to=dev-zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox