From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9kom-0000cU-GC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 18:59:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E4C5E02F4; Thu, 28 May 2009 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.140]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7F9E02F4 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=NeddySeagoon) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M9kok-00051I-Lx for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 18:59:06 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:58 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How not to discuss To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: (from antarus@gentoo.org on Thu May 28 19:36:06 2009) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.28 Message-Id: <1243537145.3439.1@NeddySeagoon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: 23ced3fe-f530-4cd4-bf63-71c26d725ba2 X-Archives-Hash: fb606a499f4e06520985d842dd6f5616 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2009.05.28 19:36, Alec Warner wrote: [snip] >=20 > The community could of course just deny the features that require > glep55 (no bash4, no global scope changes, etc..) I guess the > community is doing that by default anyway by repeated discussing this > glep and not implementing anything. >=20 >=20 >=20 [snip] GLEP55 is not in a fit state to be approved. Its a technical paper=20 submitted to this list for peer review. As many have pointed out, as a=20 technical paper. it lacks quantified, objective discussion of the=20 problem and the various solutions it touches on. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe3vkACgkQTE4/y7nJvatqXQCfR70cUj06JN4bOFuccihREE6x J18Ani/YQ5jSLql6X3uff27FHfkrZFgp =3DJ2CX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----