From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-36237-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1M8xkl-0006Ho-4j
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:43 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F2DE02B4;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net (relay01.mx.bawue.net [193.7.176.67])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAA1E02B4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [129.69.212.50] (hspc30.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.212.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: stoile)
	by relay01.mx.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CE148065
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:35:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?
From: Philipp Riegger <lists@anderedomain.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1243347848.9837.9.camel@localhost>
References: <18971.38030.314626.857360@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <1243347848.9837.9.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:35:40 +0200
Message-Id: <1243348540.9661.48.camel@hspc30.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 1ac5e0e8-f1ea-4545-a510-de7c1325248e
X-Archives-Hash: 3a4aca38ea992c57897e84b19e26b185

Hello world!

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano M=C3=BCller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
> > As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages.
> > We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category
> > (eselect itself would stay in app-admin).
> >=20
> > Opinions?
>=20
> Yes in general. Maybe think about what happens when the Universal Selec=
t
> Tool gets released/used. Possible alternative: app-select?

How will that tool be called? Maybe uselect?

Another alternative: app-xselect.

Philipp