public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:24:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242325462.4014.0@NeddySeagoon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242261133.23088.82.camel@localhost> (from leio@gentoo.org on Thu May 14 01:32:12 2009)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2009.05.14 01:32, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Hello,
> 
[snip]

> Project maintainer-wanted
> =========================
> 
> Abstract:
> There are currently quite some package requests (over 3000)
> languishing
> on bugzilla waiting for a developer or team to get interested and
> package it in the official gentoo-x86 portage tree. However in quite
> some cases that might not happen for quite a while even with very
> popular packages desired by users. The purpose of the
> maintainer-wanted
> project is to get as many of such packages to the official tree as
> possible as a stopgap solution.
> 
[snip]
> 
> Discuss! :)
> 
> Mart Raudsepp
> Gentoo Developer
> Mail: leio@gentoo.org
> Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
> 

Mart, 

I'm against for many of the reasons AllanJB outlined. There is no point 
in adding more unmaintained packages to the tree. Over time, the 
average quality of the tree will suffer.

We could use user contributed ebuilds attached to bugs as a way to 
bring Sunrise to the contributors attention just by posting a comment 
to the bug. If the contributor follows up, we get another user 
maintained ebuild in Sunrise, which is good, as the current developers 
don't have to do all the work. We already know some Sunrise 
contributors become developers so perhaps we can use this as a way to 
attract more contributors (both users and developers).

Its probably a bad idea to send all the bugspam at the same time, 
Sunrise might be overwhelmed, which would be bad for Sunrise and user 
contributors who would feel let down  

- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoMYdYACgkQTE4/y7nJvav1hgCfULFWGyBpvXC5dy5KrekYYM80
QhIAnjM0GQQQKuzkf17Oj56RH7Z1X5cl
=wK1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-14 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14  0:32 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-14  1:24 ` Gokdeniz Karadag
2009-05-14  1:27 ` AllenJB
2009-05-14 14:44   ` Richard Freeman
2009-05-15  7:43     ` Thilo Bangert
2009-05-15 10:04       ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-05-15 10:44         ` Daniel Pielmeier
2009-05-15 12:24           ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-05-19 23:24             ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-15 10:25       ` [gentoo-dev] " Richard Freeman
2009-05-19 23:51         ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-20  0:55           ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-06-01 23:17             ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-14  1:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa
2009-05-14  5:41   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-05-14  5:54     ` Patrick Lauer
2009-05-14 12:49       ` Alexander Færøy
2009-05-14 14:13         ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-05-14  9:09   ` Christian Faulhammer
2009-05-14 10:12   ` [gentoo-dev] " Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-14 17:06     ` Thomas Sachau
2009-05-14  6:53 ` Pacho Ramos
2009-05-14 11:02 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-14 14:23   ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-14 14:50     ` Richard Freeman
2009-05-19 23:54       ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-20 15:36         ` Richard Freeman
2009-06-01 21:19           ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-14 18:24 ` Roy Bamford [this message]
2009-05-14 18:48   ` Thomas Sachau
2009-05-17  9:00     ` Tobias Scherbaum
2009-05-19 23:35   ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-17 18:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-05-19 23:42   ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-05-28  7:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Volkov
2009-06-01 21:24   ` Mart Raudsepp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1242325462.4014.0@NeddySeagoon \
    --to=neddyseagoon@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox