From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-35442-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LtLhz-0001js-Ag
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:19 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B841DE0900;
	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928CFE0900
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.164] (NATPOOL-IP12.nat.iskratelecom.ru [82.199.96.76])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D8F653C3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3
From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20090409153246.2dda1026@snowcone>
References: <1236498557.6854.51.camel@neuromancer>
	 <1239241866.29054.38.camel@localhost>  <20090409153246.2dda1026@snowcone>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:55:29 +0400
Message-Id: <1239627329.13571.36.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: b60035ca-8bbb-45b0-b8af-8d05f6f12981
X-Archives-Hash: 87250e1988e205eb130e2c369828f656

=D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 09/04/2009 =D0=B2 15:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh=
 =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> Please provide a list of packages that use custom configure scripts,
> that currently work with econf (including all the weird things it
> already passes), that would break with this change and whose ebuilds
> are using econf. I have yet to see any examples provided.

Only one package fail completely here: dev-libs/elfutils. But there are
much more packages which does not fail but issue warning about
unsupported option.

--=20
Peter.