From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LiYDi-0008Ks-5H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:04:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 391F6E0209; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F80E0209 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [77.246.104.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED196647E0 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1236888142.13104.6.camel@localhost> References: <1236098878.4106.24.camel@localhost> <20090306210351.5d724c2f@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <1236888142.13104.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SsSA6yBq3mAL0s5Lkv1N" Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:02:45 +0300 Message-Id: <1237053765.31719.4696.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 X-Archives-Salt: 19a86967-1eda-4406-a3ee-5a521e46bb2b X-Archives-Hash: 6d22422340c895b23b5628e52f37b4b7 --=-SsSA6yBq3mAL0s5Lkv1N Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 12/03/2009 =D0=B2 21:02 +0100, Alex Legler =D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt > http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.diff You have: EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile src_insta= ll I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare function for EAPI=3D0,1? If not I think eclass should either die or put some fake depend like: case ${EAPI} in 2) : ;; *) DEPEND=3D"INCORRECT-EAPI" ;; esac --=20 Peter. --=-SsSA6yBq3mAL0s5Lkv1N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkm78UUACgkQz6tlgEWSarMtoACcDqDFtpG18xEIKK/DkvcDmqRA 188An1pCTUjHfKSKq7amwVJr2oMQLMdx =Mgef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SsSA6yBq3mAL0s5Lkv1N--