public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:17:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236158276.30071.5.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090302235913.21375f90@snowcone>

Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 23:59 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted
> > to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24
> > components that were masked or using masked packages in
> > base/package.mask so we just made sure those packages had the proper
> > keyword visibility.
> 
> So if you could mask 'testing'ish things that're in the overlay
> (already possible),

well there was nothing masked in the overlay really, for 2.24, because
the overlay is for testing stuff already. Let me try to rephrase and see
if I can make it clearer. Although we moved some packages to the tree,
some packages didn't ended up moving because they needed more testing or
huge regression fixing patches but they were masked by gentoo-x86 masks
because of their dependencies. Hence the mask reverting in overlay.

>  and provide an easy, consistent way for users who
> choose to to unmask and keyword a particular group of packages, would
> that solve the problem?

wrt to previous point, it would probably help a great deal even though
I'm not sure it would completely solve this case.

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo




  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27  2:41 [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays Mart Raudsepp
2009-03-02 16:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-02 23:55   ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2009-03-02 23:59     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-04  9:17       ` Gilles Dartiguelongue [this message]
2009-03-05  1:37   ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-03-05  1:58     ` Zac Medico
2009-03-05  2:16       ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-03-05 10:20         ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-03-05 12:24           ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-03-05 13:47           ` Daniel Pielmeier
2009-03-18  2:30   ` Mart Raudsepp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236158276.30071.5.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj \
    --to=eva@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox