From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdOtA-0005BO-1q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16EC7E03F0; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B1E03F0 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (unknown [79.120.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA3E64458 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1c3d94820902240614w67b15425v64893808dda793b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A2C40D.3060601@gentoo.org> <20090223132202.1cd1337e@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A30C3F.2030209@gentoo.org> <20090223205438.0349f967@snowcone> <20090223161525.458b78e2@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <20090223221915.108441bd@snowcone> <1235483708.23500.60.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <1c3d94820902240614w67b15425v64893808dda793b1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k" Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:04:47 +0300 Message-Id: <1235826287.850.391.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 X-Archives-Salt: 333233fa-0998-462a-9c86-dbadb188e208 X-Archives-Hash: 9dddb0f82514e5617c028f3f5e5e4419 --=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 24/02/2009 =D0=B2 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba =D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use > slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage. >=20 > 1: > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/luc= ene-contrib.eclass It's better (the only way...) to die in case an ebuild sets lower EAPI, like kde4-functions.eclass does: case ${EAPI} in 2) : ;; *) die "No way! EAPI older than 2 is not supported." ;; esac --=20 Peter. --=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmpNm8ACgkQz6tlgEWSarPJ+wCbB0OCK/iQhdZRf6lnWT1dLpbI ArkAoKHTnRQrCDw8b8Ih/79dUB4D8FXx =64OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k--