From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34651-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LdOtA-0005BO-1q
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:56 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16EC7E03F0;
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B1E03F0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (unknown [79.120.45.105])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA3E64458
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was:
[gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1c3d94820902240614w67b15425v64893808dda793b1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost>
<efeb8d230902230228s1e9f1f06ja5e1e90f5f13d005@mail.gmail.com>
<49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A2C40D.3060601@gentoo.org>
<20090223132202.1cd1337e@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca>
<49A30C3F.2030209@gentoo.org> <20090223205438.0349f967@snowcone>
<20090223161525.458b78e2@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca>
<20090223221915.108441bd@snowcone>
<1235483708.23500.60.camel@liasis.inforead.com>
<1c3d94820902240614w67b15425v64893808dda793b1@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k"
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:04:47 +0300
Message-Id: <1235826287.850.391.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5
X-Archives-Salt: 333233fa-0998-462a-9c86-dbadb188e208
X-Archives-Hash: 9dddb0f82514e5617c028f3f5e5e4419
--=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 24/02/2009 =D0=B2 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba =D0=
=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use
> slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage.
>=20
> 1:
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/luc=
ene-contrib.eclass
It's better (the only way...) to die in case an ebuild sets lower EAPI,
like kde4-functions.eclass does:
case ${EAPI} in
2) : ;;
*) die "No way! EAPI older than 2 is not supported." ;;
esac
--=20
Peter.
--=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?=
=?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?=
=?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?=
=?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?=
=?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?=
=?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkmpNm8ACgkQz6tlgEWSarPJ+wCbB0OCK/iQhdZRf6lnWT1dLpbI
ArkAoKHTnRQrCDw8b8Ih/79dUB4D8FXx
=64OP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-ESh/XmvsOqK0SljyGo7k--