From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:42:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235565758.4155.1.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090224174725.GC3506@hrair>
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 09:47 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:26:48PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th
> > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> > irc.freenode.net) !
>
> Informal request, but it would be useful to get an idea of the
> councils views on portage overlay compatibility issues.
>
> Specifically, when it comes to gentoo repositories, there is one, and
> only one definition of what that is- pms's repo spec. The problem
> here is that the only repository truly conformant to that spec is
> gentoo-x86, for the rest of the repositories (overlays realistically)
> whatever portage supports seems to be the eventual standard they grow
> towards.
>
> Problem with this is that there is *zero* way to spot these non-pms
> repositories as it stands. Simplest example, under portage overlays
> can unmask pkgs globally (gnome overlay reverting masks in
> gentoo-x86),
I reply here as part of the gnome herd and partly responsible for the
mask reverting in the overlay. I didn't know something used in
gentoo-x86 couldn't be used in an overlay. Could you point me to the
PMS section that treat this ?
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 7:26 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26 Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-24 17:47 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-24 18:01 ` Santiago M. Mola
2009-02-25 12:42 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue [this message]
2009-02-25 12:56 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-25 7:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-25 11:06 ` Petteri Räty
2009-02-25 12:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Open council spot Torsten Veller
2009-02-26 19:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26 Luca Barbato
2009-02-26 19:19 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-26 19:22 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 19:34 ` Luca Barbato
2009-02-26 19:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 20:40 ` Luca Barbato
2009-02-27 20:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-28 13:04 ` Regarding live sources management proposals (Was: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26) Luca Barbato
2009-02-26 19:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26 Donnie Berkholz
2009-02-26 19:39 ` Brian Harring
2009-02-25 14:22 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235565758.4155.1.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj \
--to=eva@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox