From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34024-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LOTdg-00043I-To
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:17 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BF56E04D3;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0819FE04D3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [77.246.104.171])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26FA6466B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official
 PMS specs
From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20090117180234.0d5a4e2f.genone@gentoo.org>
References: <4971D89D.10202@gentoo.org>
	 <20090117153805.7d2af630.genone@gentoo.org> <4971FC25.6040605@gentoo.org>
	 <20090117180234.0d5a4e2f.genone@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6a765E0JCvPIvyQBnQhc"
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:07:33 +0300
Message-Id: <1232269653.28710.40.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 
X-Archives-Salt: 096ae713-0416-4ba4-a924-cb56fe4d583c
X-Archives-Hash: 4c7c1c38537c8722a4c73987c96b3c91


--=-6a765E0JCvPIvyQBnQhc
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Marius Mauch schrieb:
> It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly=20

FYI, I've opened bug to add repoman check for this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255358

/me also had feeling that it's good idea to rely on implicit RDEPEND and
since it's not true, it's better to warn developers about that.

--=20
Peter.

--=-6a765E0JCvPIvyQBnQhc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkly8VUACgkQz6tlgEWSarPp/wCeKiKZ2OT+L5zBs6egcfyVKcXH
h9UAn3ZvcdyjVv0/VsUSyvs+kx/EXm2v
=6Gde
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-6a765E0JCvPIvyQBnQhc--